A new Falcons regime faces their first draft test

Q: What challenges does the Atlanta Falcons' new regime face in the 2026 draft?

The Falcons' new regime faces the challenge of making impactful selections with only five picks, especially without a first-round pick for the first time since 2012.

Q: How did previous drafts impact the Atlanta Falcons' success?

Previous drafts, particularly under Terry Fontenot in 2021, resulted in missed opportunities that hindered the team's success, with only a few standout players emerging from that class.

Q: What are the Falcons' goals for the 2026 draft?

The Falcons aim to acquire youth, impact starters, and valuable role players to address long-term roster needs, while also considering trades to create more picks.

Q: What can the Falcons' draft strategy indicate about their future plans?

The Falcons' draft strategy will reveal their long-term roster building goals, including whether they prioritize immediate impact or future flexibility through trades.

ATLANTA, GA - JANUARY 15: The Atlanta Falcons run onto the field during pregame festivities against the Green Bay Packers during their 2011 NFC divisional playoff game at Georgia Dome on January 15, 2011 in Atlanta, Georgia. (Photo by Streeter Lecka/Getty Images) | Getty Images The initial draft class is a crucial one for a new regime, and that’s no less true for the Matt Ryan, Ian Cunningham, and Kevin Stefanski cerberus in Flowery Branch. When you nail a core set of picks, as Thomas Dimitroff did in 2008 despite an uneven class overall, it can set the team up for success for multiple seasons. Getting Matt Ryan right defined an entire era of Falcons football and bought Dimitroff more than a decade in Atlanta, and useful players like Sam Baker, Curtis Lofton, and Kroy Biermann were key pieces of the initial five year run of success that saw the Falcons pull together five straight winning seasons and four playoff appearances. When you largely miss, as Terry Fontenot did in 2021, that can have knock-on effects that help to doom an entire era. Only Kyle Pitts and Drew Dalman really stood out from that class, and injuries and stretches of shaky play helped ensure Pitts wasn’t *really* successful in Atlanta after a promising rookie season until his fifth year. Almost everyone else was a short-term starter, role player, or disappointment. The had persistent problems filling roster gaps throughout Fontenot’s tenure in no small part because those early picks didn’t prove to be plus additions, though that’s hardly the whole story. The Falcons of 2026 are in a very different situation than the Falcons of 2008 and 2021. While both teams had tight cap situations, both also had more picks to work with. Dimitroff ended up making 11 picks and Fontenot nine, while Ian Cunningham will have five to work with initially unless he can flip players or picks for more. That puts a little less pressure on this class—especially since Atlanta’s without a first round pick for the first time since 2012—but I think Cunningham himself would tell you it still matters a great deal. This team *wants* youth, they want impact starters and valuable role players, and they know they’re not getting those guys in free agency until 2027 at the earliest. Their free agency period has largely wrapped up, after all, and it featured short-term deals aplenty. This is, above all, the chance to make a statement and determine a course. The new front office made it clear they’re thinking about the future with their free agency deals, given that they’ll have a fairly clean cap sheet heading into 2027, but that means there’s very little to give us a clue about their roster building goals over the long haul. Whether they aim to create more picks this year by sacrificing a veteran player on the trade market or trading down, aim to create more picks for next year by moving down, or just stand pat with five selections, the FO can tell us what they’re after with the moves they make. That’s doubly true for the players they actually pick, which will help clue us into their preferred player profiles, perceived long-term roster needs, and so forth. If the Falcons don’t come away from 2026 with difference makers, it will not spell the end of this particular regime. Fontenot’s true unraveling only came later, when the team’s strategy of pursuing aggressive trades, splashy signings, and pouring resources into a single position each offseason led to an uneven group that was stuck in neutral. With Dimitroff, meanwhile, the team sank into the muck twice in his tenure on the back of big swings that also hollowed out the roster and draft classes that largely did not pan out. There’s time for this new regime to make their own mistakes and (hopefully) find a new way to success, and failing to land a transformative class with just five picks would surprise very few of us. But not adding real talent that fills major long-term needs would be a red flag for the new regime, even so, and I hope we’re able to look back on this class fondly a few years from now.