😳 Arsenal helped by VAR? Total uproar, West Ham and fans furious 🤬

Kavanagh was called to the monitor and, from the moment of the goal to the final decision, a full five minutes passed. During the on-field review — as reported by Sky Sports — as many as 17 different frames were analysed, with attention focused on the contact between Raya and Pablo, who had extended his arm into the Arsenal goalkeeper.

For the referee, that intervention was enough to rule out West Ham’s goal. Furious Hammers protests followed, while Arsenal were able to breathe a huge sigh of relief.

🤬 West Ham FURIOUS: Wilson quotes Mou, Bowen rages after the game

"I prefer not to speak" by Jose Mourinho: that was the image used by the scorer of the disallowed goal, Callum Wilson, on his Instagram. An image that speaks volumes, just like the words of Hammers captain Jarrod Bowen after the match:

"You can’t steamroll a goalkeeper, of course, but Raya came out to claim the ball and has to expect a bit of contact. This is the Premier League: physical contact is part of the game. My feeling is that if you look at an incident long enough, you’ll always find something to give as a foul. Anyone who knows football knows it remains a physical sport. If this is a foul, then it has to be one every week. The real problem is understanding where the line is and what the standard actually is.”

West Ham manager Nuno Espírito Santo also hit out strongly, arguing that in today’s football “it’s no longer clear what is and isn’t a foul.”

👊 Arteta defends referee and VAR: "Clear foul, right decision"

As expected, Arsenal manager Mikel Arteta defended the VAR decision to disallow Wilson’s goal. “When you look at the footage there is no doubt, it’s a clear foul. They were very brave,” he said.

📺 The controversy explodes: punditry and criticism over the decision

This incident is being talked about everywhere, and while it has raised plenty of doubts, the issue is not so much the intervention itself as the context of the move and the interpretations in the Premier League.

The Athletic offered a very harsh analysis, calling the scene “the perfect image of the 2025-26 Premier League”.

According to the paper, it was right to punish Pablo’s contact on Raya — held by the forearm as he tried to come out — but the real problem was the total chaos inside the West Ham box: at the same time, there were supposedly at least three other obvious fouls involving pushes, holding and mutual blocks, including Rice’s two-handed challenge on Mavropanos.

From there came the newspaper’s provocative reflection: VAR spent five minutes in front of the screens trying to work out “who was fouling whom” in a situation compared to “a Super Bowl game.”

The Telegraph struck a similar tone, pointing the finger at refereeing inconsistency: it recalled the goal Arsenal scored at Old Trafford last August, when Saliba allegedly impeded and “used his elbow” on Altay Bayindir in the move that led to Calafiori’s goal, yet there was no VAR review. It wrote, “Inconsistent officiating is at the heart of the controversy.”

Our own Gianpaolo Calvarese also weighed in, likewise highlighting the inconsistency of the English refereeing line: similar contact in the Premier League often goes unpunished. For the former referee, however, the main issue remains the endless length of the VAR review: the longer a check lasts on incidents like this, the more controversy and tension inevitably grow (HERE IS HIS OPINION).

On social media, the controversy has exploded and promises to drag on for a long time, with analysis, accusations and endless debate. All of it as the Premier League approaches its final, decisive matchdays: a title race in which, in the end, VAR may have had a huge and decisive impact.

This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇮🇹 here.