Ohio State's ability to win with defense in the evolving Big Ten is under scrutiny. The conference now features a mix of traditional physicality and modern offensive strategies.
Mentioned in this story
Ohio State Buckeyes defensive end Kenyatta Jackson Jr. (97) and defensive tackle Kayden McDonald (98) celebrate in the second half of the NCAA football game at Michigan Stadium on Saturday, Nov. 29, 2025 in Ann Arbor, Michigan. | Samantha Madar/Columbus Dispatch / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images
The question sounds old-school, but the answer is more modern than it seems.
At first glance, it almost feels outdated. In a conference now defined not only by traditional Big Ten physicality but also by transplanted West Coast spacing, NFL-style quarterback play, and increasingly aggressive offensive design.
Asking whether Ohio State can still win with defense sounds like asking whether a heavyweight can still win with a jab.
Of course it can, but not in the way it once did. Ohio State is not trying to grind out 17–13 wins in a contained, old-school environment. It is navigating an expanded conference filled with offensive diversity, tempo, and quarterback-driven attacks.
The real question is no longer whether defense still matters, but whether it can still drive a championship-caliber team. Recent history suggests it can, even if the path looks different each and every year. “Winning with defense” did not ultimately carry the Buckeyes last season, but it proved dominant during their 2024 national title run — a reminder that when the structure, talent, and execution align, the formula still holds.
The evidence starts with what the Buckeyes actually were in 2025. In Matt Patricia’s first season, Ohio State finished No. 1 nationally in scoring defense at 9.3 points allowed per game, No. 1 in total defense at 219.1 yards allowed per game, and No. 1 in passing defense at 129.7 yards allowed per game.
The Buckeyes also led the nation in opposing red-zone percentage and first downs allowed per game, while allowing fewer 10-, 20-, and 40-yard plays than any team in the country.
The Big Ten has seen a shift towards NFL-style quarterback play and aggressive offensive designs, blending traditional physicality with modern tactics.
Yes, Ohio State's defense is being evaluated for its effectiveness against the increasingly dynamic offenses in the modern Big Ten.
Kenyatta Jackson Jr. and Kayden McDonald are key defensive players for Ohio State, contributing to the team's defensive strategy and performance.
Ohio State faces challenges from high-powered offenses that utilize spacing and speed, requiring adaptability in their defensive approach.
Mark Vientos shines with a homer and double as Mets top Diamondbacks 3-1!
Knicks fan's outburst disrupts tribute to Nick Nurse's late brother
Mitch Marner's first playoff hat trick helps Golden Knights rout Ducks 6-2, taking a 2-1 series lead.
Victor Wembanyama drops 39 points as Spurs take a 2-1 lead over Timberwolves
Chelsea aims to avoid a seventh league defeat against Liverpool at Anfield.
See every story in Sports — including breaking news and analysis.
That is not just good enough to complement an offense. That is foundational dominance, and it came in the same modern landscape people keep insisting has made elite defense impossible.
The phrase “winning with defense” is often misunderstood because it evokes a conservative, clock-choking brand of football that no longer projects cleanly onto the sport’s best teams.
Modern elite defense is not about dragging everything into the mud, it is about compressing efficiency, stealing space, and eliminating explosives so that even good offenses are forced to drive the field with patience.
Ohio State’s 2025 defense embodied that. It did not lead the nation in havoc rate or takeaways, which Ryan Day himself acknowledged as an area where the Buckeyes still wanted more, but it consistently kept opponents behind schedule, suffocated explosive plays, and made scoring drives feel expensive and methodical.
In a sport driven by chunk gains and red-zone efficiency, that is a modern winning formula.
That distinction matters when projecting forward to the 2026 season. Ohio State does not need to recreate last year’s defense play-for-play to remain a program that can win with defense. It needs to preserve the traits that travel best across eras and across conferences. Coverage adaptability, structural soundness, red-zone discipline, and front-to-back communication.
Patricia’s success was not just built on elite rankings or recruiting, but on limiting successful plays and pairing scheme with talent. That kind of system is more sustainable than one built purely on talent, takeaways and variance.
Ohio State does not need a time machine to keep winning with defense. It needs continuity in the principles that still beat modern offense.
The modern Big Ten, however, makes that job harder, and even more valuable. The conference still features physical line of scrimmage football, but it now includes offenses designed to spread the field, attack matchups, and stress defenses horizontally and vertically.
That makes versatility critical. A defense that can handle both power football and modern spread concepts is more important now because there are more offensive archetypes to face on the path to a championship. Ohio State’s defensive identity has worked because it has not been tied to one style.
It has been built to answer multiple problems within one structure.
The challenge entering 2026 is turnover. The Buckeyes lost key pieces like Caleb Downs, Sonny Styles, Arvell Reese, and Kayden McDonald and that makes any assumption of repeat dominance unrealistic. But the portal era changes that equation.
Ohio State can now replace experience with experience, not just potential. By adding transfers across the depth chart, the Buckeyes can maintain maturity even while replacing star power. The modern game cuts both ways. Offenses have evolved, but so has roster construction.
There is also a schematic reason to believe the answer is still yes. Patricia’s system appears built to adapt rather than stay rigid. Spring reports emphasized flexibility, experimentation with personnel groupings, and a willingness to tailor the scheme to the roster.
That matters in a conference where the offensive challenges vary week to week. The best defenses now are not static, they are very dynamic. Ohio State showed that understanding in 2025, and the next step is proving it can replicate that adaptability with a new group.
At the same time, the burden on the defense is different. Ohio State does not need its defense to carry a limited offense. It needs it to elevate one.
With talent like Julian Sayin and Jeremiah Smith, the Buckeyes simply need a defense that can control games, preserve field position, and prevent momentum swings. “Winning with defense” in 2026 is not about low-scoring games every week. It is about having a unit reliable enough to stabilize everything else.
The real risk is not whether Ohio State can win with defense. It is whether it can replicate dominance. The 2025 unit was historically good, allowing fewer points and yards than any FBS defense in over a decade. Expecting that level again, especially with roster turnover, is unrealistic.
The more reasonable expectation is that Ohio State remains strong enough defensively for that to be the most dependable part of the team in its biggest moments.
That is ultimately the answer. Yes, Ohio State can still win with defense in the modern Big Ten, because modern defense is not about nostalgia. It is about adaptability, structure, and eliminating what matters most.
The Buckeyes have already proven that formula works. Now they just have to prove it is sustainable.