
CTA supports the referee's decision not to award Osasuna a penalty against Barcelona during their recent match. Barcelona won the game 2-1, moving closer to the La Liga title.
CTA backs referee decision to not award Osasuna a penalty vs Barcelona
FC Barcelona took a big step closer to lifting the La Liga title this past Saturday when they defeated CA Osasuna 2-1 away at El Sadar.
Two late goals from Robert Lewandowski and Ferran Torres on either side of a Raul Garcia strike helped the Blaugrana clinch a crucial win at a tricky stadium.
However, during the match, there was a moment when the Barça fans had their hearts in their mouth as their team could have conceded a penalty.
Just six minutes in, Osasuna appealed for a penalty for an alleged foul on striker Ante Budimir by Joao Cancelo.
However, referee Isidro Diaz de Mera waved play on, and the VAR did not intervene either, much to the relief of Barça and the frustration of their hosts.
Now, the Technical Committee of Referees (CTA) confirmed today that the referee’s decision in the match between Osasuna and Barcelona was correct, and that VAR was right not to intervene.
At first glance, particularly in still images, Cancelo’s challenge on Budimir’s instep appeared to be a potential foul. However, when the action is reviewed at real speed, the interpretation changes significantly.
The referee decided not to award a penalty to Osasuna during their match against Barcelona.
Barcelona won the match 2-1, with goals from Robert Lewandowski and Ferran Torres.
The victory against Osasuna brings Barcelona closer to lifting the La Liga title.


See every story in Sports — including breaking news and analysis.
The CTA published a detailed analysis in its ‘Tiempo de Revisión’ programme to address the controversy. The focus is on the sequence of events and which player reached the ball first in a high-speed situation.
And the committee’s conclusion is clear: “The visiting player reaches the ball first and clearly plays it. It is the home player who subsequently makes contact with him.”
The committee also reiterated the standard interpretation for this type of contested ball: “In loose ball situations, attention must be paid to who legitimately plays the ball and to the sequence of the subsequent contact.
“When a player touches the ball cleanly and the contact occurs as a consequence of the opponent’s action, no infringement can be awarded against the first player.”
“It is not a penalty because the Barcelona defender plays the ball and then receives the impact from the Osasuna attacker,” the committee concluded.
Source: SPORT