French broadcaster defends TMO after Bath's Johann van Graan criticized missed head contact calls during a semi-final match. Van Graan demands consistency from officials regarding foul play incidents.
Key points
Johann van Graan called for consistency from officials
Three head contact incidents were allegedly missed
French broadcaster defended the TMO's actions
All footage was reportedly shared correctly
Bath's Alfie Barbeary is tackled by Bordeaux's Adam Coleman
Johann van Graan called for "consistency" after saying that three carries from Alfie Barbeary made direct contact to the head [Getty Images]
France's television broadcaster of the Champions Cup has responded to criticism of the television match official (TMO) from Bath boss Johann van Graan, saying "the video referee is the master of what he wants to see".
Van Graan said that foul play incidents were missed in his side's semi-final loss to Bordeaux-Begles, and called for more consistency from officials.
He said they missed three instances of head contact on Bath's Alfie Barbeary, but the broadcaster says all footage was shared correctly.
"The video referee is the master of what he wants to see, and nowadays he has access to every camera, every angle," France Televisions' rugby editor Cedric Beaudou told AFP.
"Until he makes his decisions, we leave him to see what he wants to see. It's impossible to hide footage."
Van Graan accepted his side was outplayed in the 38-26 defeat but said "certain things are not picked up when you play away from home in France".
European Professional Club Rugby (EPCR), who organise the tournament, also defended the TMO and explained how the video footage is used by the video referee.
"The TMO interventions are managed by the television broadcast," EPCR told AFP.
"Two screens are used: one live, and another with a five-second delay. This is identical for all EPCR matches.
"Every incident the TMO wants to study can be the subject of a formal review."
The Champions Cup final takes place on 23 May where Bordeaux will defend their title against Leinster.
What did Johann van Graan criticize about the TMO's decisions?
Johann van Graan criticized the TMO for missing three instances of head contact involving Alfie Barbeary during Bath's semi-final match.
How did the French broadcaster respond to Bath's criticism?
The French broadcaster stated that the TMO is in control of what footage to review and that all relevant footage was shared correctly.
What are the implications of the TMO's decisions in rugby matches?
The TMO's decisions can significantly impact the outcome of matches, as they are responsible for reviewing foul play and ensuring player safety.
Related Articles
Cricket·Recap
IPL 2026 | Hardik Pandya update: Ryan Rickelton shares latest on MI skipper’s illness
Mumbai Indians captain Hardik Pandya missed the IPL 2026 match against Lucknow Super Giants due to back spasms. Ryan Rickelton provided an update, expressing uncertainty about Pandya's recovery timeline but remaining hopeful for his return.
Yahoo Sports··1 min read
Sports·Feature
"Los relevos podemos ganar dos o tres medallas en el Europeo de Birmingham"
Los relevos españoles aspiran a ganar medallas en el Europeo de Birmingham.
Marca··1 min read
Cricket·Recap
LSG IPL 2026 playoff qualification scenarios: Lucknow Super Giants hopes all but gone after six straight losses
Lucknow Super Giants' playoff hopes are nearly gone after a sixth straight loss in IPL 2026.
Yahoo Sports··1 min read
NBA·Feature
Former Cats remaining in the NBA Playoffs
Several former Kentucky Wildcats are competing in the NBA Playoffs.
Yahoo Sports··1 min read
Soccer·Feature
Changes made at St. James' Park - thanks to your feedback
St. James' Park has made changes based on your feedback! More improvements are on the way.
Yahoo Sports··1 min read
Cricket·Recap
IPL 2026 | 'I was never rated as a T20 player': KL Rahul's candid admission ahead of DC vs CSK clash
KL Rahul shines in IPL 2026, discusses T20 challenges before DC vs CSK clash.