
Anderson haunts Newcastle to rescue draw for Forest
Elliot Anderson scores late equalizer to secure draw for Nottingham Forest against Newcastle
Gary Parrish criticized the media's reaction to the NCAA Tournament's expansion to 76 teams in 2027 as 'hyperbolic.' Many fans and media members have expressed strong opposition to this change.
Mentioned in this story
Credit: CBS Sports College Basketball on YouTube
Itâs difficult to reach a consensus on anything in America. However, almost everyone reacted with dismay to the news that the NCAA Tournament will expand to 76 teams in 2027. One of the most popular sporting events will be altered in a way that the majority of fans and the media vehemently oppose.
Change is coming, and there is nothing we can do about it. So, what will this mean for our TV viewing experience? We recently spoke with college basketball insider Gary Parrish about the future of March Madness. Parrish is a CBS Sports columnist and television analyst, a co-host of the Eye On College Basketball podcast with Matt Norlander, and the host of The Gary Parrish Show on Grind City Media.
Note: This interview has been edited and condensed for length and clarity.
Awful Announcing: Whatâs your immediate reaction?
Gary Parrish: âI share the opinion with most that itâs a net negative for the sport and that we havenât been leaving good teams out of the bracket as much as weâve been putting some very mediocre teams in it, certainly at the power-conference level. Now, with an expanded field, itâll just be more of that, to some degree, at the expense of the regular season.
âAll of that said, I stop short of the hyperbolic claim that âitâs going to ruin or kill the sport.â I canât think of many examples where expanding the postseason has destroyed anything. We have expanded the NFL playoffs, Major League Baseball, and the NBA, and we still enjoy those postseasons. So, I donât think itâs great, but I also donât think itâs nearly as devastating as some have suggested.â
The NCAA Tournament will expand to 76 teams starting in 2027, altering the format of this popular sporting event.
Many fans and media members believe the expansion will negatively impact the viewing experience and dilute the tournament's excitement.
Gary Parrish is a CBS Sports columnist and television analyst who described the media's reaction to the NCAA Tournament expansion as 'hyperbolic.'
The changes are expected to alter the dynamics of March Madness, although specific impacts on the viewing experience remain uncertain.

Elliot Anderson scores late equalizer to secure draw for Nottingham Forest against Newcastle

Aston Villa's hopes for a top-four finish dashed in 2-2 draw with Burnley.
Paul Pierce discusses why Durant's relationship with the Rockets may not last.
Texas Longhorns' $28M NIL investment may be at risk due to center depth issues.
Mets' season woes deepen with Bo Bichette opt-out rumor from insider
Jos Buttler's touching gesture: gifts bat to Vaibhav Sooryavanshi after IPL 2026 match.
See every story in Sports â including breaking news and analysis.
Who is the biggest loser in all of this?
âPeople who like to get a bracket on Sunday and know exactly who their favorite team is playing will know less of that now than ever before. There was a time when Greg Gumbel would come on CBS, and weâd have a 64-team bracket, and you would know immediately who you were playing, where you were playing, and when you were playing.
âNow, the bracketâs going to come out on Sunday, and a not-insignificant number of people arenât going to know who their first game in the NCAA Tournament is going to be against because weâre waiting for teams to play into the main bracket. Again, not the biggest thing in the world, but part of this sportâs popularity is built around brackets and filling them out, and now thatâs a more complicated process than itâs ever been.â
Who is the big winner?
âItâs the SEC. Itâs the Big Ten. I guess, to some degree, the ACC and the Big 12 as well, but the Big Ten and the SEC were really driving this, and itâs simple to understand their motivation. Over the decades, these leagues have grown accustomed to sending a certain percentage of their teams to the NCAA Tournament.â
How have the power conferences justified expansion?
âWell, when youâre in the SEC and you expand and you add big brands like Texas and Oklahoma, or youâre the Big Ten and you expand and you add big brands like UCLA and Oregon, or youâre the Big 12 and you expand and you add big brands like Houston and Arizona, when youâre pushing everybody else in your league down spots, in some cases multiple spots, by definition making it more difficult for them to win as often in conference, by definition more difficult to build at-large resumes, and also more difficult for you to get the same percentage of league members into the NCAA Tournament that you used to get, so what is a way to address that?
âThink of this not as a basketball tournament but as a restaurant with a certain number of tables. If all the tables are full but you would like to seat one more couple, the best way is to add another table with more chairs. Thatâs what theyâve done.â
Is there any benefit for the mid-majors?
âYeah, a mid-major conference is going to get a second team in certain years that otherwise wouldnât. Thatâs going to happen, but thatâs not why weâre doing it. We are mostly doing it because the power conferences want it. Itâs a revenue generator, and in college athletics for a long time now, weâve been doing almost anything we can to generate revenueâŠ
âOnce upon a time, if you qualified for the NCAA Tournament, you were still going to be alive on Thursday afternoon, because thatâs when we were going to start it. Now, a lot of teams will have their postseason experience done before most of us really lock in to what is traditionally known as the NCAA Tournament, specifically on that first Thursday of the NCAA Tournament.â
So, itâs not really much of a benefit?
âWe have created eight more spots in the NCAA Tournament, but each year youâll find that most of those spots go to SEC, Big Ten, Big 12, ACC, and/or Big East schools. To go back to the restaurant table analogy, it is like this restaurant just got more tables. They built a whole new wing with a new room, and there are more tables, so itâs theoretically easier to get into the restaurant now than itâs ever been, but you donât even know where to find the phone number to make a reservation. In the meantime, your rich buddies over in the SEC and the Big Ten have the phone. Theyâve got a secret number.â
Was there a single person driving all this?
âI donât think any one person has the power to get something like this done. To get something like this done, youâve got to have people with the power to do it involved. That would be the NCAA. Youâve got to have people with power to throw around who are willing to go down this path. That would be the SEC and the Big Ten. Youâve got to have television networks that are willing to pay for it. So, thereâs no one person who made this happen. Greg Sankey, the SEC commissioner, has been the most powerful and vocal proponent of this for many years. Once he started talking about it publicly, it became pretty clear we were going to get to this day. He is one of the most powerful people in college sports.â
Do you have a sense of what the NCAA Tournamentâs broadcast partners, CBS Sports and TNT Sports, think of this?
âI certainly wouldnât want to speak on behalf of Turner, CBS, or anybody else. Iâm just a columnist/podcaster. But itâs more about live sports programming. If they didnât think they could make money from it, I donât know that theyâd be going down this path. And if weâre going down this path and the television networks are pleased with how it looks on paper, at least weâll see how it plays out. Obviously, the fan reaction has been less than ideal. But the television networks, the NCAA, and everybody involved were smart enough to understand what they were walking into. They knew they were doing something largely unpopular with college basketball fans.â
Do we know how the new play-in games format will work?
âIâve still got to figure out where these games are going to be played. Some of them will be in Dayton. Some of them will be at a site to be determined. But in the simplest terms, we used to start with two games on Tuesday night. Then weâd get two more games on Wednesday. One of those games that night was between 16 seeds. The other was between at-large teams. By Thursday, weâre at 64. Letâs go. This will start earlier on Tuesday than itâs ever started. Youâll have more games than youâve ever had. Youâll have more teams competing to play into the main bracket than youâve ever had. So, it will look different on Tuesday and Wednesday.â
Are we heading toward a day when the NCAA Tournament includes 96 teams?
âSure. If somebody with the power to make it happen is convinced thereâs more money to be made by doing it. I understand the sentiment that it can be too much. Iâm not a basketball coach trying to get a team into the NCAA Tournament. Iâm not a television network executive trying to generate revenue for a network. Iâm not a power-conference commissioner trying to get more of my teams into the field. Iâm just a basketball fan. As a basketball fan, if it were up to me, weâd have 64 teams. It fits perfectly on a piece of paper. Everybody knows who theyâre playing on Selection Sunday.â
The post Gary Parrish calls some media reaction to NCAA Tournament expansion âhyperbolicâ appeared first on Awful Announcing.