Indiana Fever vs. Los Angeles Sparks: How to watch Caitlin Clark's next game, time, channel and more
Catch Caitlin Clark as the Indiana Fever take on the Sparks! Game at 10:30 p.m. ET on USA.
Howard Webb clarified that Benjamin Sesko's goal against Liverpool was allowed despite a possible handball. The goal, scored in the 14th minute, raised controversy due to the ball appearing to touch Sesko's fingertips.
Howard Webb explains why Benjamin Sesko goal v Liverpool was given despite apparent handball
PGMOL chief executive Howard Webb has explained why the controversial Benjamin Sesko goal against Liverpool earlier this month was allowed to stand.
The Manchester United striker netted in the 14th minute of the game at Old Trafford to make it 2-0, but there was a contentious element to the goal as the ball appeared to touch his fingertips just before crossing the goalline.
DOWNLOAD THE OFFICIAL EMPIRE OF THE KOP APP FOR ALL THE LATEST & BREAKING UPDATES â STRAIGHT TO YOUR PHONE! ONÂ APPLEÂ &Â GOOGLE PLAY
The Premier League Match Centre account on X explained that âthere was no conclusive evidenceâ of a touch off the Slovenianâs hand before scoring, although former PGMOL chief Keith Hackett insisted that âthe law states that you cannot score a goal with your hand, even if considered accidentalâ.
On the latest episode on Match Officials Micâd Up, the VAR audio from the Sesko goal decision was made public, with those in Stockley Park finding âno conclusive evidenceâ of the ball touching the strikerâs hand.
Howard Webb explained that the goal was permitted because the handball was not deemed to have occurred in a way that violated the rules.
Benjamin Sesko scored in the 14th minute of the match against Liverpool.
Benjamin Sesko played for Manchester United when he scored the goal against Liverpool.
The score was 2-0 in favor of Manchester United when Benjamin Sesko scored his goal.
Catch Caitlin Clark as the Indiana Fever take on the Sparks! Game at 10:30 p.m. ET on USA.
Coco Gauff edges past Mirra Andreeva to reach Italian Open semis
Dallas Cowboys duo Lawrence and Fowler reunite in Seattle; Aikman praises Hurts.
Discover the top 5 first basemen in the MLB National League right now!
OKC Thunder sweep the Lakers and await their next playoff opponent!
Mark Matthews to announce college decision on May 15; Texas A&M in contention.
See every story in Sports â including breaking news and analysis.
Webb outlined that the official wouldâve needed certainty on the decision to disallowed the goal, saying:Â âI think it probably does hit the hand, but of course the VARs need that conclusivity. They need to be absolutely certain that it does, and it doesnât matter what we think, does it? It matters what they think, and we do ask them to be sure that something needs acting upon.
âClearly, Sesko doesnât deliberately handle this. He doesnât make himself bigger. Itâs all very natural, but of course, the Laws of the Game require any goal that comes off the hand immediately, or where the player scores immediately after hitting the arm, then it has to be disallowed, and that means the VAR has no option but to start looking for that.
Image via Sky Sports
âSometimes it looks like theyâre being a bit too forensic, and you hear, in this situation, the VAR looking from various angles. They want to get it right.
âIf it does conclusively come off the arm, but they donât get to that level of certainty, they probably think it probably does as well, but they need to be absolutely categorical to get involved, and they werenât able to find it, and hence the reason that the on-field decision stood.â
Want more Empire of the Kop coverage? Add us as a preferred source on Google to your favourites list for news you can trust
We agree with Webbâs verdict that Sesko didnât deliberately handle the ball and that the contact was minimal, and we understand why the officials would need certainty in order to cancel out a goal in that instance.
However, going back to the law about any goal scored off the hand (even accidentally) being instantly disallowed, we believe the replays show sufficient evidence of a touch off the Slovenianâs fingers (however minor), so by right it shouldâve been chalked off.
The decision was ultimately a significant one as Man United won the match 3-2, and even the point that Liverpool were denied could eventually prove pivotal in the race for Champions League qualification.
We accept that the Reds needed to do a lot better in the lead-up to Seskoâs goal, having given away possession so cheaply and then being caught on the counterattack, and their first-half performance at Old Trafford was lamentable.
Nonetheless, supporters may feel aggrieved over Webbâs explanation of the VAR decision for that crucial moment, though it canât be changed now and Arne Slotâs team must ensure that they take care of their own business in their final two games of the season.