IndyCar Star Defends Lewis Hamilton After Recent Ferrari Simulator Meltdown

Who doesn’t love the feel of a real car? Right? And who better to judge if a simulator is worth the hassle or not, better than the seven-time Formula 1world champion? Right? So, will you call Lewis Hamilton’s complaints regarding the Ferrari simulator wrong? If you haven’t been living under a rock, you would probably know how much Hamilton has been complaining about the SF-26 simulator.

As ESPN reported, Lewis Hamilton has even gone on to say: “I’m going to have a different approach in the next race because the way we’re preparing at the moment is not helping.” To the champ, the feel on the track is vastly different from what he feels inside the simulator. And again, you can’t really blame him for saying so.

IndyCar Star to Hamilton’s Defense

And former IndyCar star James Hinchcliffe seems to agree. Back on the F1 Nation podcast, Hinchcliffe went on to point out, “Ultimately, a simulation is just that: it’s a simulation. It’s not the real thing.” Despite Ferrari’s multi-million dollar investment in their simulator facility in Maranello, the state-of-the-art engineering marvel still cannot produce the same results as the SF-26 does on the grid.

You see, engineers can mathematically perfect tire and aero models on a computer, but they hit a hard physical ceiling when it comes to the driver’s seat. “The one thing you cannot do is replicate the feeling of a race car from inside the cockpit,” he continued. “You can have it move around the room and simulate a fraction of the G-force that you actually feel in the car, fine, but it’s not going to talk to you. It’s not going to really give you that visceral feedback in the same way.”

This lack of visceral feedback perfectly explains the disaster in Florida. We discussed this problem a few days back. Despite SF-26 getting an 11-part upgrade package, which was targeted to “significantly boost” performance, it ultimately resulted in nothing.