
Palace and Birmingham promoted to the WSL as Charlton into play-off
Crystal Palace and Birmingham promoted to the WSL; Charlton enters play-off.
Trading back late in the first round has shown a low success rate for Pro Bowl selections, with only 12.5% of picks from 25-32 making the Pro Bowl in the last decade. Teams that traded down have often acquired valuable players, suggesting a strategic advantage in moving back.
If we look at picks 25-32 over the last 10 years, there have only been 10 players selected in that range that have made a Pro Bowl with 2 of those 8 making it as alternates. Of those 8 players, only 2 have made the Pro Bowl more then once, TJ Watt and Tre’Davious White. So when people want to complain about not taking a guy at the end of the first round and trading back into the second round, you have a 12.5% chance of selecting a guy at the end of the first round that could make a Pro Bowl.
So if I am a GM and I have a chance to do what Beane did and move out of the first while then moving up in rounds 3 and 4, why would you not do that? Then Hornell Fred added a very logical retort: The opening paragraph in Fred’s comment sent me on a research mission. I assumed the initial 10-year time frame from bozzman1106’s comment was 2016 – 2025 (10 draft classes), so I checked all those 80 picks from No. 25 – No. 32 overall to see the results for all of the teams. I counted 12 of 80 picks, which equals 15%, yet bozzman1106’s likely did not include TreDavious White or who were made with trade downs initially made before pick No. 25, which got him to 12.5% (10 out of 80). After the recheck, I realized there can be secondary labels to distinguish how those picks were acquired. Of those 12 overall Pro Bowl selections made over the past 10 drafts at picks No. 25 – No. 32, I divided based on whether the selection was an original pick, acquired after a trade down initially outside our late first-round pick range, or acquired after a trade up into it. **Original pick Pro Bowlers**: (4 of 12, 33%) : DT Clark : EDGE T.J. Watt Seahawks: LB Ravens: LB **Pick acquired with trade down before pick No. 25** (2 of 12, 16.6%) Bills: CB TreDavious White Ravens: OC Tyler Linderbaum **Trade ups into picks No. 25 – No. 32** (6 of 12, 50%) Browns: TE Njoku Ravens: QB Washington: EDGE : EDGE Jaguars: LB Bills: TE Here are the results of the juiciest aspect of this study — what did teams get that *traded back* from those picks between No. 25 and No. 32 over the past 10 years? You know, what the Bills have down twice now since 2024. Turns out there were 19 trade downs by teams that held a pick in that range the past decade. *(I did not count prior trades that involved a veteran before the draft, or the 2024 trade between the Broncos and Saints that included Sean Payton.)* Those 19 trade downs netted the following collection of 46 players. *(Subsequent trade down / ups which used some of the picks acquired in the original trade down were counted.)* Of the group of 46, those in **bold** have been named to a Pro Bowl, even as an alternate.
Only 12.5% of players selected between picks 25-32 over the last decade have made the Pro Bowl.
Teams like the Bills and Ravens have successfully traded back and still acquired Pro Bowl talent, including players like TreDavious White and Tyler Linderbaum.
Over the past decade, 19 trade downs from picks 25-32 resulted in the selection of 46 players.
Trading back can allow teams to acquire multiple picks and potentially select more valuable players, as evidenced by the success of teams that have done so in recent drafts.

Crystal Palace and Birmingham promoted to the WSL; Charlton enters play-off.

Sunderland and Wolves end in a 1-1 draw; Ballard sent off for hair pull

West Ham's 3-0 loss at Brentford gives Spurs a chance to escape relegation.

Newcastle beats Brighton 3-1 to end five-match losing streak!
Inside Steve Bisciotti's Unconventional Scouting for Adam Randall
MLB execs believe Twins will trade Joe Ryan at the deadline
See every story in Sports — including breaking news and analysis.