
Jeglertz not worried by Man City title wobble - should he be?
Man City stumbles in WSL title race with loss to Brighton
The Jaguars are challenging the Consensus Big Board during Day 2 of the NFL Draft, which aggregates evaluations from various scouts and analysts. This board helps teams identify talent value and potential draft strategies.
The Consensus Big Board is one of the closest things the National Football League has to a shared opinion of players. Built by blending together dozens of evaluations from scouts, analysts, and draft outlets, it attempts to strip away individual bias and highlights how the broader football world collectively values each prospect. NFL fans often think of the Consensus Big Board less like a simple ranking and more like a crowd-sourced scouting brain. For teams navigating a deep, tightly packed class, it can offer a clear lens into where talent is likely to fall and where the real value pockets exist.
Per NFL Mock Database, from 2020 to 2025, the Pittsburgh Steelers and Baltimore Ravens have generated the best value in rounds 1-3, consistently drafting players later than their projected rankings. Meanwhile, teams like the New England Patriots, Dallas Cowboys, and St. Louis Rams have consistently produced some of the widest variances from the consensus board, each operating with a different level of alignment to industry expectations. In the Rams’ case, that gap has skewed heavily in one direction, ranking as the third-worst organization over that span, routinely selecting players well ahead of their projected range, with an average reach of roughly 15 spots above the consensus.
The Consensus Big Board is a collective ranking of NFL draft prospects, created by combining evaluations from scouts, analysts, and draft outlets to minimize individual bias.
The Jaguars are noted for challenging the Consensus Big Board, indicating they may select players differently than the rankings suggest.
The Pittsburgh Steelers and Baltimore Ravens have consistently generated the best value in rounds 1-3 by drafting players later than their projected rankings.
Teams like the New England Patriots, Dallas Cowboys, and St. Louis Rams have shown significant variances, often selecting players much earlier than their consensus rankings.

Man City stumbles in WSL title race with loss to Brighton

¡Paquito Navarro vuelve a jugar con Martín Di Nenno en Premier Padel!
Denver Broncos pick Jonah Coleman in the 2026 NFL draft
Bayern Munich staged a remarkable comeback to defeat Mainz 4-3, with Jamal Musiala playing a pivotal role. He scored a crucial goal and assisted the winning goal, earning him the title of man of the match.
Tyler Onyedim joins the Broncos, focused on learning from the best.
Arsenal's title hopes take a hit as Kai Havertz injures his leg against Newcastle.
See every story in Sports — including breaking news and analysis.
That level of deviation points out a clear organizational tendency, which seems to be mirrored by General Manager James Gladstone: while the consensus draft board generally defines value across the league, certain teams may be far more willing to ignore it, instead betting on their internal evaluations, even when it means stepping well outside the industry’s comfort zone. “Strategically bold.“
This brings us to your 2026 Jacksonville Jaguars, who notably took a few big swings in the 2026 NFL Draft, with surprisingly aggressive selections in three of the team’s opening four picks. While there are multiple consensus big boards available online these days, we went with the NFL Draft Industry Consensus Big Board to evaluate the Jaguars’ draft picks. This big board does not include fan mock draft data, simply using a compilation of rankings from different draft boards around the industry, such as:
| Player | Drafted | Consensus | Variance |
| TE Nate Boerkircher (Texas A&M) | Pick 56 (Round 2) | Pick 151 (Round 5) | +95 Projected 2.5 rounds |
| DT Albert Regis (Texas A&M) | Pick 81 (Round 3) | Pick 165 (Round 5) | +84 Projected 2 rounds later |
| OL Emmanuel Pregnon (Oregon) | Pick 88 (Round 3) | Pick 52 (Round 2) | -36 Projected 1 round earlier |
| Jalen Huskey (Maryland) | Pick 100 (Round 3) | Pick 220 (Round 7) | +120 Projected 3 rounds later |
Note: A negative draft variance reflects value added to the team, indicating that a player was selected later than where the industry broadly ranked them (i.e., a roster addition at a savings). A positive number signals a reach, with a team selecting a player earlier than analysts projected in the pre-draft process.
With no first-round pick in hand due to the 2025 Travis Hunter trade, the Jaguars’ decision to go sharply against the grain with their first two selections drew immediate scrutiny, especially as neither pick addressed the team’s most glaring 2025 weakness: the interior pass rush. That combination of positional prioritization and consensus deviation did not sit well with a large portion of the fanbase on Friday, who likely expected a more direct investment in the pass rush department, an outside cornerback, or a linebacker to help Anthony Campanile’s defense.
JaxSouthsider
And now an undersized NT who’s best at run defense in a draft with a ton of NT depth when what we really need is interior pass rush.
This is absolutely terrible. I have to go to bed. I questioned if Gladstone was a good drafter before tonight. Now I question if he’s better than Gene Smith
acedarney
I’ll admit that I haven’t watched him play closely, but this feels like another reach for a backup player in the top 100.
cverbra814
I was confident we had found our HC in Coen by Week 4 of last season. I am still waiting for Gladstone to give me a reason to believe in him.
Spider2Y_Bother
I’ll say this: if you were in the camp of “positively skeptical” about James Gladstone’s draft capability this pick did little to ease your concerns
With a whopping seven (7!) selections remaining on Saturday, the team has ample opportunity and ammunition to shift the fan narrative.
What were your thoughts on the opening two days of the draft, Duval?