Jeff Stoutland offers blunt assessment of Eagles’ 2025 offensive woes

For months, there were theories. Was it just bad play-calling? Were injuries the issue? Chemistry? Maybe it was personnel changes. Everyone had an idea about what went wrong with the Philadelphia Eagles' offense in 2025.

Jeff Stoutland left. That was a tough thing to watch. He didn't say much. As expected, he kept things classy. Then, he visited New Heights, and while chatting with his former pupil, Jason Kelce, he finally spoke. And as expected, he didn't overcomplicate things. He delivered a blunt, no-frills explanation that cut through months of speculation. According to him, the issues weren't mysterious or layered. They were fundamental. Stoutland pointed directly to the offense's inability to consistently perform at a high level. He also cited poor play-calling timing and a tendency to run ineffective concepts into unfavorable defensive looks.

That's it. No grand theory. No hidden issue. Just football. Some might call it a shot. Others might classify it as an old-school guy's explanation.

The Eagles would want to get back to the basics.

Stoutland's comments reflect something that often gets lost in modern analysis. When offenses struggle, the conversation tends to drift toward scheme, innovation, or personnel upgrades, but in his view, success still comes down to doing the simple things at a high level. Blocking the right assignments. Calling the right plays, and executing with precision... It still works, and that standard slipped in 2025. Sure, the Eagles still found ways to win games, but the consistency that once defined their offense, particularly in the trenches, wasn't always there. Even staples of their identity, like the quarterback sneak, didn't carry the same dominance.

That said, it's hard to disagree with anything Stoutland said based on the good old-fashioned eyeball test. Stoutland's view verifies what we all saw: a lack of cohesion.

Jeff Stoutland's voice still carries weight.