Liverpool could sign their own Rayan Cherki for just £12m

There is also a clear attacking instinct. “He loves to get in there and drive,” Barter said, pointing to his tendency to attack the box and contribute to chance creation. Statistically, that shows up in strong attacking output, with “assist, touches in the box, shot assist, xG, goals, all in the above 70 percentiles.”

In terms of style, the comparison raised in the discussion is telling. Mayulu was likened to Rayan Cherki, particularly in how he operates in tight areas. As Barter put it, “output extreme, but can we carry him was the question,” a line that captures both the excitement and the concern.

Photo: IMAGO

Concerns over physicality and off ball work

For all the attacking promise, there are clear limitations. Barter was direct in his assessment, saying “he not doing a lot off the ball for me, he wasn’t really doing much for me off the ball.”

This becomes a major issue in the Premier League. Liverpool’s midfield demands intensity, structure and defensive discipline. Barter questioned whether Mayulu could meet that standard, stating “I’m not seeing his contribution off the ball being good enough to play in the midfield.”

That concern extends to tactical balance. “The other two in our midfield have got to be extremely good off the ball… to carry a 19 year old kid in the 10,” he explained, highlighting the potential burden on teammates.

Positional fit and development pathway

Another challenge is role clarity. Unlike more versatile prospects, Mayulu’s profile is heavily focused on attacking midfield. Barter pointed out, “this kid only plays there,” raising concerns about squad integration.

Game time is also uncertain. With competition already high in advanced roles, Barter questioned “where are you going to play him? How many minutes are you going to get him in his preferred position?”

Davis acknowledged this but suggested Liverpool may view him as a rotational option, someone who can “pick a pass and make something happen” in shorter bursts.

Liverpool decision: calculated risk or unnecessary gamble

The debate ultimately centres on risk tolerance. Mayulu offers clear technical quality and attacking upside, traits Liverpool value. Barter recognised that “he has a lot of high areas, receiving, he’s very strong at that,” reinforcing his potential.

Yet the concerns remain significant. Physicality, defensive contribution and minutes all present barriers. Barter summed it up cautiously, saying “it could work, but theory and on the pitch is two very, very different things.”

For Liverpool, this is a familiar dilemma. Do they invest in raw attacking talent and trust development, or prioritise players ready to contribute immediately?

Senny Mayulu sits firmly in the first category. If Liverpool believe they can coach the off ball work and provide the right pathway, the reward could be substantial. If not, this risks becoming another talented player without a clear role.