Michigan State Basketball Transfer Portal Targets to Watch

Michigan State Basketball Transfer Portal Targets to Watch

The Spartans are shaping up to be one of the more intriguing teams to watch in the transfer portal this offseason.

After bringing in multiple transfers a year ago, Michigan State has shown a willingness to adapt — even as outside perception continues to question how effectively the program utilizes the portal compared to others across college basketball.

With roster needs, particularly in the frontcourt, expect Izzo and his staff to be aggressive — especially in pursuing a true center to fill the void left by departing production in the middle.

Several names have already surfaced as players in communication with Michigan State. While no commitments have been made, these are among the most notable targets currently on the Spartans’ radar.

Aiden Sherrell — Alabama (PF/C)

Aiden Sherrell stands out as one of the most compelling options for Michigan State — and perhaps the most realistic.

The Detroit native, who was heavily recruited by the Spartans out of high school, started all 34 games this past season and produced at a high level, averaging 11.1 points, 6.2 rebounds, and 2.2 blocks in just under 24 minutes per game.

Sherrell’s efficiency is what separates him. He converted 64% of his two-point attempts and posted a 63% true shooting mark, both indicators of elite shot selection and finishing ability. He also consistently draws contact, ranking among the top percentile in free throw rate.

Defensively, Sherrell profiles as an immediate difference-maker. His block rate ranked near the top nationally, and advanced metrics like RAPM further reinforce his impact on both ends of the floor.

With familiarity, production, and positional need all aligning, Sherrell appears to be a natural fit in East Lansing.

Anton Bonke — Charlotte (C)

Another name gaining traction is Anton Bonke, a 7-foot-2 center with a unique blend of size and efficiency.

Bonke averaged 10.6 points and 8.3 rebounds while starting the majority of the season for Charlotte. Despite carrying a significant offensive workload, he remained efficient, converting over 61% of his two-point attempts.

What makes Bonke especially intriguing is his ability to stretch the floor. He knocked down 34.2% of his three-point attempts — a respectable mark for a player of his size — contributing to a strong overall effective field goal percentage.

He also brings value on the defensive end as a rim protector and rebounder, grading out highly in both block rate and rebounding metrics.

While his perimeter defense is limited, that aligns with his role as a traditional anchor in the paint. If added, Bonke would likely provide depth and size rather than serve as a centerpiece addition.

Treyson Anderson — North Dakota State (PF/C)

Treyson Anderson is another versatile frontcourt option who has drawn interest from Michigan State.

In a reduced role at North Dakota State, Anderson still produced efficiently, averaging 10.4 points and 5.3 rebounds in just over 18 minutes per game. His 60% true shooting and strong two-point efficiency highlight a player who makes the most of his opportunities.

Anderson also shows promise defensively. He ranked among the top tiers in both block rate and defensive rebounding percentage, suggesting he could develop into a reliable presence in the paint at the high-major level.

While his free throw shooting remains an area for improvement, his ability to draw fouls and impact the game defensively makes him an intriguing developmental piece.

Given Izzo’s history of targeting players he’s seen firsthand, Anderson fits a familiar recruiting pattern.

Samet Yigitoglu — SMU (C)

Rounding out the list is Samet Yigitoglu, a highly productive big man with a strong two-way profile.

Yigitoglu has been a consistent presence for SMU, starting every game over the past two seasons while averaging 10.7 points and 7.9 rebounds this year.

Offensively, he excels around the rim, converting 63% of his two-point attempts and maintaining an efficient scoring profile overall. Defensively, he brings rim protection with a strong block rate, making him a reliable interior presence.

Advanced metrics also support his impact, placing him among the top tier of transfer portal players in overall efficiency.

The primary concern lies at the free throw line, where he struggled significantly. However, his overall production and consistency make him one of the more polished big men available.

Final Thoughts

Michigan State’s approach to the transfer portal will be one of the biggest storylines of the offseason, and this group of big men highlights exactly where the Spartans are looking to improve.

Whether it’s a high-impact addition like Aiden Sherrell, a developmental piece with upside, or a proven interior presence, the priority is clear — size, efficiency, and rim protection.

For Tom Izzo, this portal cycle presents an opportunity to reshape the narrative around Michigan State’s ability to compete in the modern era of roster building. With the right additions, the Spartans could take a significant step forward heading into next season.

As of now, no decisions have been made — but the groundwork is being laid. And if early indications are any sign, Michigan State is far from sitting this portal season out.