
Sesko backs 'great' Fernandes for player of the year
Sesko endorses Fernandes as top contender for Player of the Year
The Green Bay Packers hold the 52nd pick in the 2026 NFL Draft, with several top players still available. This article tiers the best remaining prospects for the Packers after the first round.
KNOXVILLE, TN - SEPTEMBER 20: Tennessee Volunteers defensive back Colton Hood (8) defends during the college football game between the Tennessee Volunteers and the UAB Blazers on September 20, 2025, at Neyland Stadium in Knoxville, TN. (Photo by Bryan Lynn/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images) | Icon Sportswire via Getty Images
The first round of the 2026 NFL Draft is behind us, but the Green Bay Packersā picks are all still to come. Green Bay heads into day two of the draft with picks 52 and 84 overall in rounds two and three, respectively, and there are still plenty of exciting players available after 32 names have come off the board.
Instead of a traditional list of the best players still available on the board, weāre previewing these top names in a bit of a different way today. Below are the names of the remaining players ranked up through #75 overall on the Consensus Big Board, but they are sorted into tiers based on how this writer (with some consultation from other APC contributors) would feel if the Packers were to land them with the 52nd pick.
Of course, the Consensus Board is limited, so there may be players under consideration at 52 who donāt show up here. Iām looking at you, Davison Igbinosun, Gracen Halton, Bryce Lance, and DeāZhaun Stribling ā youāre all between 79 and 85. And if any of you end up as the Packersā pick at 84, Iāll be pretty happy with that as well.
At 52, though? Hereās how we will feel about the players currently ranked in the top 75.
The article ranks the best available players for the Packers at pick 52, sorted into tiers based on their potential impact.
The Packers have picks 52 and 84 in the second and third rounds of the 2026 NFL Draft.
Players like Davison Igbinosun, Gracen Halton, Bryce Lance, and DeāZhaun Stribling are ranked between 79 and 85.
The Consensus Big Board provides a ranking of players, but the Packers may consider additional players not listed in the top 75.

Sesko endorses Fernandes as top contender for Player of the Year

Arsenal's women's team meets OL Lyonnes again in Champions League semis, with Stina Blackstenius aiming for victory.
Stuarts Draft girls soccer team shines with eight freshmen, currently 6-1-2!
Khushdil Shah opens up about being dropped from Pakistan team despite strong domestic performance
See every story in Sports ā including breaking news and analysis.
This category of players are ones who we believe to be first-round talents at positions of need. They are so unlikely to fall to the Packers that if they do get one of them, weāre going to lose our minds. In fact, if they continue to fall into the 40s, theyāre the players whom we could see (and accept) the Packers trying to trade up for.
Most of these players are our favorite targets who still seem like they could realistically be available at 52. If you are new here, well, suffice it to say that we think that Orange and DDS are significantly underrated. Any of these players would make us extremely happy. Boston is an odd one here though in that he should be one of the first players off the board on Friday; heād be in the above tier if he was at a bit more of a critical position.
These are simply good prospects ā theyāre either really good players at positions of lesser need or those who we think should turn out to be good pros but donāt have the ceiling of the names in the tiers above.
This is a one-man category and itās all about health. This was Will Johnson last year, the Michigan cornerback who fell from being a likely top-10 pick into the second round due to health concerns. The phrase ābone plugsā associated with McCoyās injury just sounds awful.
Here we have players who would leave us puzzled for one reason or another. Drafting these players at 52 would be either a weird use of resources from a positional standpoint, players who donāt fit the Packersā typical approach or testing thresholds, or some combination thereof. It doesnāt necessarily mean that we think the player will not be a good pro, but itās more a question about their fit or the use of resources.
Note that a couple of the cornerbacks who show up on this tier are here because they are likely to be slot-only options.
These players are ones who we donāt see as complete players (Thomas, Hill) or who we feel are overvalued by the consensus board (Brazzell).
These are our biggest bust fears or players who we think simply are a poor fit and/or a poor use of resources for the Packers. There are those who like Hunter for the Packers, but his testing numbers were extremely underwhelming and we have concerns about his ability to actually hold up on the nose.