

The New York Times claims British cryptographer Adam Back is the likely identity behind Bitcoin's creator, Satoshi Nakamoto, based on his early work and writing style. Back has denied these claims, reiterating he is not Satoshi and referring to his previous statements on the matter.
The New York Times published an investigation on Wednesday arguing that Adam Back, the British cryptographer who invented Hashcash, is the most likely person behind the Satoshi Nakamoto pseudonym used by Bitcoinâs creator.
Back denied the claim, telling Cointelegraph he was referring reporters to his post on X after previously rejecting similar attempts to identify him as Satoshi. Back reiterated in the post that he is not Satoshi, adding that he âwas early in laser focus on the positive societal implications of cryptography, online privacy and electronic cash, hence my ~1992 onwards active interest in applied research on ecash, privacy tech on cypherpunks list which led to hashcash and other ideas.â
The investigation was conducted by John Carreyrou, a French-American investigative journalist best known for exposing the Theranos fraud. In the report, he claims that Back, who was cited in Nakamotoâs Bitcoin white paper, actively discussed electronic cash for years, then vanished just as Bitcoin (BTC) emerged, only to reappear after Satoshi disappeared.
The story revives one of Bitcoinâs oldest mysteries by putting one of the protocolâs earliest and most influential cryptographers at the center of a new attempt to identify Satoshi, but the case remains circumstantial without cryptographic proof.
The investigation also leaned on stylometric analysis, arguing that Backâs writing shared features with Satoshiâs, including formatting habits, hyphenation quirks and overlapping technical language. The report did not present that analysis as conclusive proof.
Adam Back talking about electronic money. Source: NYT
Among the mailing-list participants, people who posted messages on the Cypherpunks, Cryptography and Hashcash mailing lists, only Back hyphenated âproof-of-workâ and referenced the obscure Russian currency WebMoney, both appearing in Satoshiâs emails, the report claimed. Similarly, Back was one of just two to write âpartial pre-image,â mirroring Satoshiâs usage, and the only one to discuss âburning the moneyâ for digital coins.
Related: Bitcoin miner wallets awaken after over 15 years â Is this Satoshi?
Backâs professional career reinforces the suspicion that he is the elusive Bitcoin creator, according to Carreyrou. He noted that Back avoided Bitcoin early, then in 2013 rapidly engaged, co-founding Blockstream, poaching top developers and raising over $1 billion.
âIt all seemed consistent with what Satoshi might do if he decided to reappear under the cover of his real name and take back the reins of his creation,â the report claimed.
Back has consistently and repeatedly denied that he is Satoshi. âIâm not. But also the documentary will presumably be wrong, as no one knows who Satoshi is,â he wrote in 2024 in response to an HBO documentary that identified Peter Todd as Bitcoinâs pseudonymous creator. Todd also denied the claim at the time.
Source: Adam Back
Related: Disappearing Satoshi statue in Lugano took 21 months to create, says artist
The crypto community has been skeptical about the new claim by Carreyrou. Jameson Lopp, co-founder and chief security officer at self-custody platform firm Casa, said Nakamoto âcanât be caught with stylometric analysis.â
Carreyrou also acknowledged that the case does not amount to definitive proof, saying cryptographic evidence would be the only real smoking gun, he wrote on X.
Magazine: Bitcoinâs âbiggest bull catalystâ would be Saylorâs liquidation â Santiment founder
Share this article
The investigation cites Back's early involvement in electronic cash discussions, his citation in Nakamoto's Bitcoin white paper, and similarities in writing style, though it acknowledges that the evidence is circumstantial.
Adam Back denied the claims, stating he is not Satoshi and referring reporters to his previous posts where he has rejected similar identifications.
The investigation was conducted by John Carreyrou, a journalist known for exposing the Theranos fraud.
Stylometric analysis examines writing styles and was used in the investigation to compare Back's writing features with those of Satoshi, although it was not presented as conclusive proof.






See every story in Crypto â including breaking news and analysis.