Celtic's controversial match-winning penalty at Fir Park has sparked debate over whether it was the worst VAR decision ever or a clear call. The outcome significantly impacts the Scottish Premiership title race.
Key points
Celtic won 3-2 against Motherwell
Controversial penalty decision sparked debate
Impact on Scottish Premiership title race
Experts divided on VAR decision
CelticMotherwellScottish Premiership
It is the decision that has got the footballing world talking. Celtic’s match-winning penalty at Fir Park.
Was it a handball? Was it a header? What does it mean for the Scottish Premiership title race?
Here are the key questions answered following another dramatic twist in the most unforgettable season...
See every story in Sports — including breaking news and analysis.
Sky Sports Football HD
Sky Sports Football HD
What happened?
The final whistle had gone at Tynecastle to seal a win for Hearts. Celtic were seconds away from drawing at Motherwell, which would have seen Hearts go to Celtic on the final day with a three-point lead.
Then, Motherwell's Sam Nicholson jumped up with Celtic's Auston Trusty to try to head the ball from a long throw-in. Nicholson's elbow was raised and was perhaps pushed further up by Trusty's shoulder.
The game stopped for a VAR check. Was that for an elbow? No. The stadium PA announced it was in fact for handball.
Referee John Beaton (centre) speaks to players before going to the pitchside monitor and awarding Celtic an injury-time penalty
Image:
Referee John Beaton (centre) awarded Celtic an injury-time penalty at Motherwell
Did Celtic players appeal for a penalty?
Many have noted that the Celtic appeals for a penalty were limited. Trusty lay on the pitch following the collision with Nicholson and held his head. He went on to complain to referee John Beaton about being elbowed by the Motherwell player. However, there were no real claims for a handball at the time.
What about 'clear and obvious'?
The three words that have been associated with VAR.
Debate has raged about whether the ball came off Nicholson's hand or if it only hit his head.
Monterosa
This content is provided by Monterosa, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Monterosa cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Monterosa cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Monterosa cookies for this session only.
The way the ball flew back out of play for a throw-in suggests it came off his head, so VAR must believe it came off his hand at the same time.
If there is doubt, can it be deemed as a clear and obvious error for the VAR to intervene?
How long did the VAR check take?
After VAR Andrew Dallas advised referee John Beaton to carry out an on-field review, he was at the VAR screen for around 22 seconds as officials used the one angle that best showed the incident. From that, it was decided Nicholson's hand was in an unnatural position, resulting in a penalty for handball.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
scottish premiership
The Sky Sports pundits debate the VAR decision to award Celtic a penalty
A 99th-minute goal but only five minutes added?
Yes, Kelechi Iheanacho's penalty hit the net with the clock at 98:27. Yes, there were only five minutes of added time. However, the handball offence itself took place at 94:52 - that's eight seconds within the added time initially indicated by the officials.
Did fans spot something else?
Well, some eagle-eyed Motherwell supporters believe the throw-in that resulted in the penalty was in-fact a foul-throw. The image below could prove their point. However, it is important to know VAR can't intervene in that.
Motherwell vs Celtic
Worst VAR decision ever?
It's a bold claim, but Motherwell's Elliot Watt believes so as he tweeted "the worst VAR decision in history". His manager Jens Berthel Askou wasn't impressed either and said: "I thought I'd seen it all this year, but apparently I haven't. It's shocking.
Twitter
This content is provided by Twitter, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Twitter cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Twitter cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Twitter cookies for this session only.
"Even if he touches with his fingernail, it's because there's contact when he goes up. His arm is here, then he gets pushed into it, so it would never be a penalty anyway."
'Clear cut' or 'disgusting'?
It might be no surprise that the two bosses battling for the title had contrasting views. Celtic manager Martin O'Neill said the decision "looks as if it's a pretty clear cut" and added "he's given it for the handball, and also an elbow on top of that there as well".
Hearts head coach Derek McInnes disagreed. "It's disgusting," he said. "I don't think it's a penalty kick. We're up against it, we're up against everybody and we'll be ready for Saturday."
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Hearts boss Derek McInnes left disappointed by VAR called to award Celtic a penalty for handball against Motherwell late on in injury-time and called the decision disgusting.
Hearts boss Derek McInnes called the penalty decision "disgusting"
Should there have been TWO MORE penalties?
Referee Beaton and VAR Dallas were certainly busy at Fir Park. In the first half they checked and dismissed an appeal from Celtic for a penalty after Motherwell goalkeeper Calum Ward collided with Daizen Maeda in the box as he tried to clear the ball.
Kris Boyd felt there was a mistake here too. "This could be a penalty," he said. "The goalkeeper makes contact with Maeda before anything else."
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Should have Celtic had a penalty just before the half-time break?
Chris Sutton believed Celtic should have had a penalty after Daizen Maeda and Motherwell's goalkeeper Calum Ward collided
Later, they also rejected Motherwell spot-kick claims when Callum Slattery went down in the area. Despite claims for a foul by Callum McGregor on Slattery, Boyd backed the referee's decision and said: "I think he slips."
Three wrong calls in a week?
Boyd believes this VAR decision is the latest that has resulted in a boost for Celtic's title bid and said it was "another dubious call which has gone in Celtic's favour".
He's referring to Steven McLean's decision not to award a penalty to Hearts against Motherwell on Saturday, despite being sent to the monitor by VAR, plus Celtic's Alistair Johnston avoiding a red card in the Old Firm game last Sunday.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
SPFL VAR drama
We take a look at three key decisions from the last week of action that have affected Hearts and Celtic in the title race.
Where does that leave the title race with one game to go?
Before that penalty was awarded, Hearts had already won against Falkirk and Celtic were set to drop two points. That would have seen leaders Hearts have a three-point advantage heading into the final day, plus a superior goal difference of six.
When the ball left the spot and hit the net, the gap was down to one point and the goal difference was down to five.
What happens next?
Quite simple. Ninety minutes. Two teams. One title.
Should Celtic win at home to Hearts, they are champions again. If Hearts win, or even draw, then it is them who will be champions.
Who are the officials for the title decider?
The Scottish FA have appointed Don Robertson to take charge of the game at Parkhead, with Kevin Clancy on VAR.
Where can we watch it?
Sky Sports Football. Live from 11.30am. Kick-off at 12.30pm. Don't miss it.
