Zak Brown, CEO of McLaren Racing, warns that the 'A team and B team' model in Formula 1 could undermine sporting fairness. This concern arises amid close ties between teams, particularly with Red Bull's ownership of multiple outfits.
Key points
Zak Brown warns about fairness in F1 due to B team model
Red Bull owns two F1 teams, raising scrutiny
Andrea Landi appointed as Red Bull's head of performance
Historical instances of team interference in races
McLaren Racing CEO Zak Brown says the ‘A team and B team’ model risks “compromising the integrity of sporting fairness” in Formula 1.
Close ties between teams have been scrutinized throughout the last two decades, during which Red Bull has owned two F1 outfits, and even prior to that – for instance when Sauber’s Ferrari-powered backmarker Norberto Fontana blocked the Scuderia’s title rival Jacques Villeneuve in the 1997 title decider.
Brown was asked about the issue shortly after Red Bull revealed it was hiring sister squad Racing Bulls’ deputy technical director Andrea Landi as its head of performance, with just two months and a half separating the announcement from Landi’s first day at work in Milton Keynes, on 1 July.
This contrasted with McLaren’s capture of Red Bull’s head of racing Gianpiero Lambiase, who also acts as Max Verstappen’s race engineer. The Woking-based squad might have to wait until 2028 before it can get ahold of the Italian.
Q&A
What did Zak Brown say about Red Bull's B team model in F1?
Zak Brown stated that the 'A team and B team' model risks compromising the integrity of sporting fairness in Formula 1.
How have team relationships in F1 been scrutinized over the years?
Team relationships have faced scrutiny for decades, particularly with instances like Sauber's Norberto Fontana blocking Jacques Villeneuve in the 1997 title decider.
Who is Andrea Landi and what is his role with Red Bull?
Andrea Landi is the deputy technical director hired by Red Bull Racing as their head of performance, starting on July 1.
What are the potential consequences of close ties between F1 teams?
Close ties between F1 teams could lead to unfair advantages, impacting the integrity of competition and the overall fairness of the sport.
Related Articles
Soccer
“At the end of the day” – Como president gives major update on Cesc Fabregas and Chelsea
Como president Mirwan Suwarso announced that Cesc Fabregas can join Chelsea as their next head coach if he chooses. This comes after Chelsea sacked Liam Rosenior, marking the second coaching change this season.
See every story in Sports — including breaking news and analysis.
But this is not just about the Austrian firm, Brown insisted. The American also brought up the Haas model, with the design office of F1’s smallest squad located in Maranello. Several members of the Scuderia previously moved to Haas, including current Mercedes deputy technical director Simone Resta, who was Ferrari’s head of chassis engineering before he instantaneously joined Haas for three years as its technical director.
“I think A/B teams, we need to get away from as much as possible, as quickly as possible. Co-ownership – which we have one group now, and I understand how that came about, why it came about – in today's day and age, that's permitted in almost, if not all, major forms of sport,” Brown said, in reference to when Red Bull bought the Jaguar team to join the grid in 2005, then took over the ailing Minardi outfit in 2006.
Christian Klien, Red Bull Racing, leading Christijan Albers, Minardi
Christian Klien, Red Bull Racing, leading Christijan Albers, Minardi
Christian Klien, Red Bull Racing, leading Christijan Albers, Minardi
“It runs a real high risk of compromising the integrity of sporting fairness. What would turn fans off as if they don't feel like there's 11 independent racing teams?
“I've been vocal about it from day one. We've seen it play out on track in a sporting way. Daniel Ricciardo taking the fastest-lap point away from us to help the other team. We've seen IP violations on the Aston Martin/Racing Point on brake ducts.”
RB driver Ricciardo pitted late in the 2024 Singapore Grand Prix to snatch the fastest-lap point away from Red Bull racer Max Verstappen’s title rival Lando Norris; the second element refers to controversy regarding the 2020 Racing Point (now Aston Martin) car, which was nicknamed the Pink Mercedes due to its similarities with the 2019 title-winning Silver Arrow. This earned the team a 15-point deduction in the 2020 championship.
Lance Stroll, Racing Point
Lance Stroll, Racing Point
Lance Stroll, Racing Point
“We've seen employees move overnight, where we either have to wait and sometimes make financial deals, which then impacts us on the cost cap,” Brown continued. “So, when you see other [staff] that move from one to the other without financial compensation, that's an unfair financial advantage, that's an unfair sporting advantage. We've seen Ferrari and Haas move people back and forth. We know IP is a lot in your head.
“So, you put that all together; can you imagine a Premier League game when you've got two teams owned by the same group, one's going to get relegated if they lose, the other can afford to lose? And that's what we run the risk of.
“So, I think having engine power units as suppliers is as far as it should go. And then in my view, all 11 teams should be absolutely as independent as possible, because I think it has a high risk and we have seen it compromise the integrity of the sport, and that will be what turns fans off quicker than anything else.”
Zak Brown, McLaren
Zak Brown, McLaren
Zak Brown, McLaren
Asked if anything has changed over the years to try and prevent the two-team model, Brown replied: “It was a big discussion in the last Concorde. I wrote to the FIA and Formula 1 last year on the topic, because we see things happen all the time and we flag them. I think there's a higher level of awareness and watching by the FIA.
“I'm glad to see quite frankly that the Racing Bulls and the Red Bull don't look like the same race car. I've had these conversations with Laurent [Mekies, Red Bull team principal] – I'm not picking on him in particular but he's the only one who's got two teams – and he's been very open and transparent of, ‘Hey, if you see something that you don't like, let's just chat about it’. So, I think they recognise it and don't want to push the envelope.
“There were discussions in the Concorde Agreement about, ‘Should over time one of the teams be divested?’. But also, I have a huge appreciation for what they've done for the sport and how that was done a long time ago.
“So, as long as it's managed, watched… but certainly adding to it would be a mistake for the sport.”