Report: Liverpool facing major battle to sign £75m forward

Liverpool’s recruitment team, led under Arne Slot, faces a delicate balance. Having already invested heavily, including a controversial £125m deal for Alexander Isak last summer, the appetite for another major outlay will be scrutinised. Yet Gordon’s versatility across the front line and Premier League pedigree make him an appealing option.

Photo: IMAGO

Newcastle’s Financial Reality Shapes Deal

Newcastle’s stance is clear. “They will open dialogue to sell Gordon if Bayern improve that starting price to £75million.” Financial pressures are a driving force, with the club needing to “sell more players in order to be active in the transfer window”.

Gordon himself appears open minded. The Times reports “there is also a belief that Gordon is open to the move”, and his head was previously “turned” by Liverpool’s interest. This creates a competitive landscape where personal preference and Champions League ambitions could prove निर्णive.

Transfer Battle Could Define Summer Window

Liverpool are not alone, with Arsenal also credited with past interest, but Bayern’s structured approach gives them an early advantage. Their history of increasing bids, as seen in the Kane deal, suggests Newcastle’s £75m valuation may eventually be met.

For Liverpool, the coming weeks will be crucial. Gordon represents both a strategic fit and a statement signing, yet the financial and competitive pressures surrounding the deal mean nothing is guaranteed.

Our View – Anfield Index Analysis

From a Liverpool supporter perspective, there is room for caution. Gordon is clearly talented, but £75m feels steep given the club’s recent spending and inconsistent return on investment. After a disappointing title defence that sees Liverpool sitting fifth, priorities arguably lie deeper than another wide forward.

There is also the question of profile. Gordon works hard and has improved his output, but replacing Salah demands elite, consistent numbers. Six Premier League goals, with three penalties, does not fully convince as a direct solution. Bayern’s interest may inflate the price beyond sensible limits.

Supporters may also question whether Liverpool are being reactive rather than proactive. Missing out on Gordon in 2024 only to revisit the move now, at a higher cost, suggests hesitation in previous windows. With other areas of the squad needing attention, committing such a fee could limit flexibility elsewhere.

Ultimately, Gordon would improve the squad, but whether he transforms it is another matter. Liverpool must decide if this is the right deal, or simply the most available one.