Should the Eagles draft for need or value with first-round selection?

The Philadelphia Eagles enter the 2026 NFL Draft facing a familiar question: should Howie Roseman -- the best GM in the business -- draft for need or stick to their long-standing philosophy of building through the trenches first? Should the Eagles prioritize talent over immediate roster gaps in the first round, trusting their ability to develop players and address needs through other avenues? That approach has helped build one of the league's most consistent contenders.

With an overhauled offensive coaching staff, this year presents a compelling case for both sides of the debate.

The case for drafting for need

Philadelphia's roster, while talented, has clear areas that definitely can use reinforcement. Whether it's along the offensive line, at the safety position, or at wide receiver, depending on how the board falls, there are positions where an immediate contributor could make a tangible impact.

With a championship window tied to Jalen Hurts and a dominant offensive line on borrowed time, plugging a hole with a Day 1 starter could help maximize the team's chances in 2026. Drafting for need can provide clarity, allowing the Eagles to leave Round 1 with a player who fills a defined role from the outset.

The case for drafting for value

Roseman's track record since 2020 suggests the Eagles won't force a pick. The organization has repeatedly shown that it prefers to let the board come to them, capitalizing when talented players slide. That philosophy has led to key additions in the trenches and beyond, often securing premium talent at positions that weren't viewed as immediate needs at the time. In the long run, those decisions have strengthened depth and created flexibility across the roster.

Roseman and the Eagles' drafting for value also protects against reaching for a player, which can lead to diminished returns if the prospect's on-field production doesn't match the draft slot.

Finding the balance

The Eagles' approach is likely to fall somewhere in between. If a player at a position of need also represents strong value, that becomes the ideal scenario, such as Penn State's dominant offensive guard, or a talented but youthful Georgia offensive tackle drops down the board. But if the board doesn't align that way, history suggests Philadelphia will lean toward talent. That flexibility is part of what has defined the franchise's success. Rather than chasing short-term fixes, the Eagles have built a roster designed to sustain contention year after year.