
Carrick: Man Utd games vs Liverpool some of my favourites
Carrick highlights the significance of Man Utd vs Liverpool rivalry
The St. Louis Cardinals face a dilemma with their catchers, primarily Ivan Herrera and Pages, as both have shown strengths and weaknesses. The team is evaluating their performance data to determine the best catching strategy for the season.
The word âdilemmaâ refers to a situation in which a difficult choice must be made, often between two or more undesirable options. I see the topic of Catchers on the boards and marvel at how many points of view there are. Pages is unplayable because of his (lack of) offense. Herrera is unplayable because of his defense, especially his throwing. Crooks showed poorly and strikes out way too much and is untested andâŠandâŠand. Then there is Pozo. A charming rags-to-riches story, but little more. Many donât understand why he is even on the roster or in the discussion. The answer to that side question became more clear last Saturday when Pages had to come out of the game when his hamstring tightened up. Without Pozo, the Cardinals lose the DH and add burden to Herrera earlier in the season than I think theyâd like. To further complicate a discussion, we could add the emerging Leo Bernal and the whistle we hear in the distance that is a high-speed train named Rainel Rodriguez. Since this is a data drive view, Iâll leave them aside â no data. Today, Iâm going to focus on the two main catching characters in this story â Pages and Herrera. We are starting to get some data. It isnât definitive, particularly on the defensive side, because defensive stats can take a long time to stabilize, as in years. But we do have some data points. Fortunately, catchers are busy enough that the data points we have are more than a few. Letâs check the data we are getting against the narratives that have formed.
Coming into the season, the Cardinals plan was to try and incorporate back into the catching rotation. Injuries limited him to 14 games behind the dish last year. Knee (bone bruise), hamstring and elbow issues all added up to a lost season from a catching standpoint, limiting him. But, boy, that bat. .837 OPS gets a personsâ attention, doesnât it? Especially when it looks like there might be even more upside there. As it has turned out in 2026, Pages has caught Liberatore, May and Leahy each turn through the rotation, and Herrera has caught and each turn. This translates into a straight up 60-40% split of the catching duties, with Pages on the strong side of the platoon. For the most part, on his non-catching days, Ivan has served as the DH. I think we have enough data to formulate some initial opinions about how this plan is working out.
The main issues include Pages' offensive struggles and Herrera's defensive challenges, particularly with throwing.
Currently, the Cardinals are using a 60-40% split in catching duties, with Pages taking the majority of starts.
Data shows that when Herrera starts, the Cardinals allow fewer runs per game compared to when Pages is behind the plate.
The catchers significantly influence pitching outcomes, with Herrera's starters showing positive win probability while Pages' starters have a net negative.

Carrick highlights the significance of Man Utd vs Liverpool rivalry

De Zerbi insists Spurs aren't relegated yet despite struggles

Knicks dominate Hawks by 51 points in playoff history
Should the Blue Jays trade their $110 million All-Star for Dylan Cease?
See every story in Sports â including breaking news and analysis.
Reader and commenter Solanus has some really interesting data collection he does on pitchers and catchers. Iâve managed to capture some of it in R queries, making the data more generally accessible (he hand collates this and Iâm not passionate enough for that). I thought Iâd start there.
| Name | Starts | Wins | Losses | RS | RA | RS/game | RA/game | SD | MD | ND | StarterWPA | RelieverWPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Herrera | 10 | 5 | 5 | 42 | 46 | 4.2 | 4.6 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 0.216 | 0.515 |
| Pages | 16 | 9 | 7 | 81 | 91 | 5.1 | 5.7 | 6 | 7 | 5 | -0.846 | 3.063 |
| The table above is a query of catcher outcomes for the 2026 season through the series with Seattle. What do I notice? The first thing that stands out is RA/game. This is a decent proxy for a more commonly cited reference called Catcher ERA. RA/game ignores Official Scorer variability and simply attributes the teams overall run prevention to the catcher who started. In prior years, Herreraâs Catcher ERA and RA/game have been noticeably higher than Pages. This year, not so much. When IH starts, the Cardinals are giving up .9 less run per game than when Pages starts. | ||||||||||||
| Solanus has developed a Shutdown(SD)/Meltdown(MD)/No Decision (ND) method for starters not dissimilar to one Fangraphs uses to rate relievers. In this method, one takes all pitcher/batter events and calculates the change in win probability that resulted from whatever outcome the pitcher experienced. Give up a HR? Win probability goes down. Strike a guy out, win probability goes up. WPA is situation dependent. Relievers tend to experience much greater WPA with one event (such as the closer getting the final out with the tie and winning runs on base), whereas pitchers tend to accumulate WPA in much smaller increments, but much higher rates, since they face more batters. Starters throwing to Herrera (McGreevy, Pallante) are experiencing a net positive WPA so far in 2026, whereas the starters throwing to Pages (Liberatore, May, Leahy) are net negative. The method evaluates WPA > .06 as a shutdown performance (SD) by the pitcher. WPA < -.06 is a meltdown (MD) pitching outcome. Otherwise, ND. As you can see in the data, Pages has worn most of the Meltdowns among starters. | ||||||||||||
| Personally, Iâm not a guy that relies heavily on Catcher ERA or RA/game, because of its apparent volatility. But if you are a person inclined to cite this stat when defending your point of view that Herrera is not workable as a catcher, you might want to check again. |
Some folks would point to Ivanâs struggles with throwing base runners out and the obvious contributions from his bat, along with the injuries, and opine that Ivan would be better off at DH or another defensive position that keeps his bat in the lineup. Others discount the impact of CS% because the low run value of a stolen base (and the relatively high negative cost of a Caught Stealing). A team has to steal a lot (!) of bases and have a high success rate for the steals to really matter. Letâs look at some underlying metrics.
| Name | Attempts | Stealing Runs | CS above Avg | CS rate | Est CS rate | Distance from 2nd | Pop Time | Xchg Time | Throw MPH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Herrera, IvĂĄn | 6 | -0.6 | -0.9 | 0% | 15% | 51.7 | 2 | 0.6 | 76.5 |
| Pagés, Pedro | 10 | 1.17 | 1.8 | 40% | 22% | 56.4 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 80.8 |
| This is obviously small sample size theater. But many of these numbers compare to historical results for each player. | |||||||||
| Herrera catches McGreevy and Pallante (not a pitcher noted for holding runners well). With these pitchers, the runners are a good 5 feet closer to second when the catcherâs throwing comes into play. Thatâs an extra half, almost full step. If you watch replays of SB attempts, 5 feet is significant. | |||||||||
| Pages is a nick faster in pop time, but both are considered average by MLB standards. In MLB, the .1 difference is close to 1 standard deviation from average. Note that Pages has a stronger arm (MPH, last column). Herreraâs is up about .5 MPH from last year. MLB average for throw velocity is 83-84, so both are below average in throwing. Herrera moreso. One thing you can glean from these numbersâŠteams are not running crazy when Ivan catches. | |||||||||
| You see the expected CS rate? If I understand, itâs a bit like xFIP and normalizes back to league averages given the pop time, exchange time and throw velocity. With the small sample, the actual CS doesnât mean a lot. Statcast estimates that with the metrics Ivan has, he would likely throw out ~15% of runners given pitchers that could hold runners closer to first. That 15% is low, but not unsustainably lower than Pages at 22% expected. I have more research to do to verify, but I gather that Pages over-performs his expected CS rate and Herrera under-performs due to the large disparity in the âdistance to second factorâ, which is functionally a matter of how well pitchers hold the runners on. |
| Name | Overturns v. Expected | Net Runs For | Challenges | Overturns | Confirms | Overturn % | Expected Challenges |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Herrera | 8 | 1.0 | 10 | 9 | 1.0 | 90% | 16 |
| Pedro Pages | 2 | 0.3 | 18 | 11 | 7.0 | 61% | 19 |
| Yohel Pozo | 0 | -0.2 | 2 | 1 | 1.0 | 50% | 2 |
The comparison charts below omit that names, but I bet you can guess which is Herrera and which is Pages.
The current format is for a 60-40 playing time split. Realistically, that is how the catcher position divides up for many teams. Rare is the everyday catcher, and rarer still is the everyday catcher who avoids injury. Only 12 catchers in MLB caught more that 105 games in 2025. A 60-40 split (or slightly different, like 67-33) is what every team, including the Cardinals, face. I donât think the Cardinals have the option of playing Ivan at C for 162 games, or even 140. One option that could be considered would be to flip the platoon basis, in favor of Herrera being 60% of the games. Playing out offense at current rates of each player, adding 30 games to Herreraâs non-DH offensive number would produce in the neighborhood of 10-12 more runs (using wRC) over what youâd expect from him at catcher on the offensive side, less 1-2 runs blocking throwing on the defensive side. Net of ~10 additional runs, that would be worth 1 win.
These are the numbers we can look at to-date. There isnât any meaningful way to evaluate game calling and other soft skills, although RA/game or Catcher ERA may provide some hints at the macro level. So far, Herrera grades out better at coaxing greater performance, moreso among the starters than relievers. That is what RA/game tells us, but that is not how the Cardinals view it internally. I see Pages and Herrera as functionally the same at framing, and Pages is slightly better at controlling the run game, but both are below average here. Overall, Pages is a bit better defensively, but perhaps nothing decisive (in the data we can observe). Herrera is materially better offensively. What to do? I think with the data above, you can see why the Cardinals have Ivan Herrera catching. Net-net, they get more out of the C position than they would with Herrera as full-time DH, and they get more out of Ivan, too. While I think one could argue that the current arrangement is the optimum arrangement to maximize both playersâ value, a gradual shift of the platoon allotment might be warranted, as Ivan gets further away from injury and recovery. At some point, we can opine that the Cardinals need to get more offense from the 60% side of the platoon. This would entail 1) moving Herrera to the long side of the platoon or 2) promoting Crooks to replace Pages and hoping he can provide more offense. Itâs not clear the Cardinals are ready to take that leap of faith. Another key question would be ⊠what would be the impact on the defense? To my eyes (looking at the data), the bar Crooks must reach defensively is to be better than average. Again, it is not clear that the Cardinals are ready to take the leap that Crooks can clear that bar. Perhaps later this year, when the season outcome is more decided. This is the dilemma from a data perspective, using the data we have to-date. Stay tuned.