Ex-referee claims VAR should not have intervened in Arsenal's second penalty during their 1-1 draw with Atletico Madrid in the Champions League semi-final. The match leaves the tie open for the return leg at the Emirates Stadium.
Key points
Ex-referee criticized VAR's role in Arsenal's second penalty
Arsenal drew 1-1 with Atletico Madrid in the Champions League semi-final
The tie remains open for the return leg at the Emirates Stadium
Arsenal is considered a strong contender for the Champions League title
“Too forensic,” Ex-referee says VAR should not have been involved in second Arsenal penalty
“Too forensic,” Ex-referee says VAR should not have been involved in second Arsenal penalty
Arsenal were held to a 1-1 draw against Atletico Madrid in the first leg of their Champions League semi-final in Spain last night, as the Gunners continue their pursuit of European glory. The result leaves the tie evenly balanced ahead of the decisive return fixture at the Emirates Stadium.
Mikel Arteta’s side have been among the strongest teams in world football this season, and many still believe they are capable of going on to win the competition. With Bayern Munich and PSG also in contention, Arsenal remain confident they can reach the final if they overcome Atletico Madrid in the second leg.
Penalty decisions dominate debate
Arsenal may feel they could have secured victory in Spain were it not for a controversial penalty awarded to Atletico Madrid. The Gunners initially took the lead from the spot, but the hosts were later given a penalty of their own after Ben White was judged to have handled the ball inside the area.
Atletico converted the opportunity, ensuring the match finished level. While both teams showed discipline and organisation, the game lacked the excitement of the previous night’s encounter involving the other semi-finalists.
A further moment of controversy arrived when Arsenal were awarded a second penalty after David Hancko was deemed to have fouled Eberechi Eze. However, following a VAR review, , sparking widespread discussion about the use of technology in such situations.
Q&A
What did the ex-referee say about VAR's involvement in Arsenal's penalty?
The ex-referee stated that VAR's involvement in the second penalty awarded to Arsenal was 'too forensic' and unnecessary.
What was the outcome of the Arsenal vs Atletico Madrid match?
Arsenal and Atletico Madrid played to a 1-1 draw in the first leg of their Champions League semi-final.
How does the draw affect Arsenal's chances in the Champions League?
The draw leaves the tie evenly balanced, allowing Arsenal a chance to advance in the competition during the return leg at home.
Who are Arsenal competing against in the Champions League?
Arsenal is competing against Atletico Madrid, with Bayern Munich and PSG also in contention for the title.
Related Articles
Sports·Feature
Can the Golden State Valkyries win a championship in the next five years? + Why is Natasha Cloud still unsigned?
The Golden State Valkyries aim for a championship within five years, as discussed by team President Jess Smith. Additionally, the article explores why standout guard Natasha Cloud remains unsigned in free agency.
Yahoo Sports··1 min read
Soccer·Transfer
£69m deal in reach for explosive forward
Liverpool's frontline faces changes as Salah leaves and Chiesa is targeted.
Yahoo Sports··1 min read
Sports
Jessica Campbell, the first female coach in the NHL, to depart the Kraken after 2 years as an assistant coach
Jessica Campbell, the first female NHL coach, leaves the Kraken after two years.
Yahoo Sports··1 min read
NHL·Recap
How Much Playoff Hockey Are the Avalanche Watching?
Avalanche Sweep Kings and Stay Engaged for Next Round
Former referee Mark Halsey has now weighed in on the incident, questioning the need for VAR to intervene. As reported by The Sun, he said: “Now for me, in real time, I thought it was a clear foul by Hanko on Eze. Yes, clumsy. Yes, there was contact. Referee Danny Makkelie gives it in real time and then VAR recommends review.
“Now was it a clear and obvious error by the match referee? In my opinion, no.
“Yes, there was contact. But it’s not a clear and obvious error, so why, once again has VAR got involved? Being too forensic, they should never have got involved.”
Halsey’s remarks reflect the frustration surrounding the decision, with many believing Arsenal were denied a crucial opportunity to take control of the tie.
With the second leg approaching, Arsenal must now focus on delivering a decisive performance at home. Despite the controversy, the Gunners remain well placed to progress if they can capitalise on their chances in North London.
You agree not to give any personal abuse to other Arsenal fans. Everyone is allowed to hold their own opinions even if you disagree with them. It COSTS NOTHING TO BE POLITE TO OTHER ARSENAL FANS.
CALLING ALL ARSENAL FANS! Anyone who would like to contribute an Article or Video opinion piece on JustArsenal, don’t hesitate to get in touch with usthrough this link…
More Stories / Latest News
“Too forensic,” Ex-referee says VAR should not have been involved in second Arsenal penalty