What Champions League failure means for 'broken club' Chelsea

"There's absolutely nothing there and it looks like a broken football club right now."

Former Chelsea goalkeeper Mark Schwarzer added on BBC Radio 5 Live: "Chelsea are running out of excuses now.

"Chelsea did not look like a side who have something so big [the FA Cup final] on the horizon and that is what is so disappointing.

"They were outfought and there was a lack of desire. The players have to start taking responsibility."

Qualifying for the Champions League was always the target for owners BlueCo this season, so how costly could missing out prove?

• Furious Rosenior questions Chelsea's desire
• Respecting the ball, losing the players - inside Rosenior's reign
• Premier League: Nottm Forest boost survival hopes with win at sorry Chelsea - reaction

What's the cost?

Whoever Chelsea appoint as their next head coach - with former Real Madrid manager Xabi Alonso, Bournemouth boss Andoni Iraola and Fulham's Marco Silva among those in contention - will have to navigate the forthcoming transfer window astutely.

In their recently published 2024-25 accounts, Chelsea reported a Premier League‑record £262m pre‑tax loss despite bringing in £490.9m in revenue - the club's second highest ever.

Following their triumph in last year's Club World Cup and a now rare season in the Champions League, Chelsea are predicting revenues will increase to £700m in next year's accounts.

However, forward Cole Palmer said in an interview this month that "everything changes" without Champions League football.

Chelsea earned approximately £78.9m in prize money for reaching the last 16 of European club football's premier competition this season compared to about £15m for winning the Conference League in 2025.

A conservative estimate would suggest those Champions League earnings rise beyond £100m when ticketing, hospitality and sponsorship revenue are included.

Accounts from parent company 22 Holdco Limited show transfer activity is a major factor behind the substantial losses, and the success of the men's team is a "clear driver" of revenues - while Chelsea are reliant on owner funding and loans to subsidise the club, which has long-term implications.

In the short term, Chelsea are bound by their Uefa settlement agreement after breaching their football earnings and squad cost rules in 2023-24.

The regulations stipulate Chelsea cannot record losses of more than than £52.2m once certain Uefa allowances are applied when filing their accounts at the end of June.

Any loss beyond that threshold would result in a fine of up to £17.4m, while losses exceeding £69.7m would trigger a one‑season ban from European competition, provided they qualify within three seasons following the breach.

That pressure continues into the 2028-29 season, with Uefa constantly monitoring Chelsea's situation.

"Chelsea have avoided Premier League sanctions through the use of related party transactions [in the past], which involves selling hotels and the women's team to other companies owned by 22 Holdco," football finance expert Kieran Maguire told BBC Sport.

"At a group level, these transactions are excluded which helps explain why 22 Holdco, which also owns both the women's team and Strasbourg, recorded a bigger pre-tax loss of £701m in 2024-25 compared to Chelsea FC Holding's loss of 'just' £262m.

"Such intra-group transactions are allowed in the Premier League cost control rules, but are specifically excluded from Uefa's rules. This is why Chelsea are under Uefa's sanctions at present but not from the Premier League."

Anger grows towards owners

Chelsea may have won the football lottery twice but, this time, the return on investment under owners Todd Boehly and Clearlake Capital is being questioned.

Chants of "we don't care about Clearlake, they don't care about us, all we care about is Chelsea FC" are increasingly becoming the anthem of a turbulent season.

There have also been previous chants of "Roman Abramovich" but those recollections are rose-tinted, particularly towards the end of the Russian oligarch's reign, where Chelsea were widely regarded as a cup team and had lagged behind their rivals in terms of revenues.

The £490.9m turnover last season was Chelsea's second highest on record but still lagged well behind their rivals in the so-called 'big six'. That gap needs to be bridged as debt grows within the parent company.

Inside Chelsea they say debt is part of a highly-structured investment approach, common in elite sport, and there is a long-term plan for sustainability.

Still, Chelsea spent the most on agents' fees and the third most on both transfers and wages last season, despite a reduction in overall spending following the unprecedented outlay in the early BlueCo years.

The cost remains evident through a league-high 'amortisation' bill - where they have spread transfer fees across the length of a contract up to five years - of more than £200m.

What has been squandered by this ownership is the strong Profit and Sustainability Rules (PSR) position they inherited. More than £1.5bn has been spent on talent, but the return in terms of consistent success in the Premier League has yet to materialise.

Chelsea are looking to add some experience to their squad at the end of the season, but more drastic decisions like any changes to management or senior executives are not being discussed openly, with mid-campaign decisions to be avoided, especially with an FA Cup final still to come.

Yet, club sources have also stressed that accountability across the organisation is embedded through annual reviews and could draw in anyone at any level should poor performance be identified.

The possibility of star players such as Palmer, Moises Caicedo and Levi Colwill being sold is constantly denied by the club, but some player sales have always been necessary, since Abramovich and into the BlueCo era, to balance the books.

"Chelsea have always been very successful in terms of player sales, which have generated substantially more money for the club than ticket sales over the last decade," Maguire said.

"The 22 Holdco business model is similar to that of a hedge fund in that signing young players on long-term contracts can be profitable and reduces the chances of players leaving on a Bosman deal for no fee."

However, everything is threatened, even attracting a new high-profile manager, without Champions League football.

• Latest Chelsea news, analysis and fan views
• Ask about Chelsea - what do you want to know?