The Boston Bruins' 2025-26 season ended after losing to the Buffalo Sabres in six games. Despite having chances to win, the Bruins were unable to capitalize, leading to an early exit from the playoffs.
Brian Fluharty-Imagn Images
BOSTON â The Boston Bruinsâ 2025-26 run came to an end at the hands of the Buffalo Sabres at the TD Garden on Friday night.
The Sabres took the series in six games.
Yes, the Sabres were the better team. They showed it: coming back in Games 1 and 3, exploding in Game 4, and keeping the game out of reach in Game 6. However, there were opportunities for the Bruins to win this series. Those opportunities just slipped through the cracks, and now, the offseason awaits.
Jeremy Swayman is not the reason the Bruins lost this series. Sure, he allowed six goals in Game 4; he was hung out to dry. He allowed three in Game 6; the Bruins made small mistakes that proved costly. Swayman willed his way to wins in Games 2 and 5, and Marco Sturm even acknowledged that without him, the series could have looked a lot worse.
âBelieve it or not, even [Game 4] he was great,â Sturm said after Game 5. âIf it [wasnât for] him, it was 10-0 after the first [period].â
The elephant in the room is the sheer 180-degree turn the Bruins had on TD Garden ice. After posting 29 home wins this season, the Bruins did not beat the Sabres once on Causeway in the postseason.
They have not won a home playoff game since May 4, 2024 â a six-game home playoff losing streak.
After Game 6, Marco Sturm said maybe it was the pressure of playing on home ice. Nikita Zadorov said that the Bruins got away from their five-on-five system at home.
âI think the margin of mistake is so high in the playoffs, and our system is created for us to play the same way in the unit of five all the time. And I think at home we got away from that a little bit,â said after the series. âNot sure the reason why. Maybe itâs [getting] a little too tight, or itâs a little more freedom because you get different changes or something. But I feel like on the road, we were the team we wanted to be.â
The Boston Bruins lost to the Buffalo Sabres in the first round of the playoffs, with the Sabres winning the series 4-2.
The Bruins and Sabres played a total of six games in their playoff series.
Key moments included the Sabres' comebacks in Games 1 and 3, a dominant performance in Game 4, and maintaining control in Game 6.
The Bruins' early exit from the playoffs means they will enter the offseason with the need to reassess and improve their team for the next season.
Fernando Mendoza might skip the White House visit due to NFL OTAs.
Indiana Fever crush Nigeria 105-57 in preseason game
NBA confirms controversial late call against Cavs in Game 6 loss to Raptors.
Golden Tempo, a 23-1 longshot, wins the 152nd Kentucky Derby!
See every story in Sports â including breaking news and analysis.
Playing on the road favored the Bruins, which was not the case throughout the regular season. Marco Sturm said that the team was able to block out outside noise while they were on the road, but struggled to do the same at home.
The Sabres outscored the Bruins 13-3 in the three games at TD Garden, and they outshot them 91-75.
After scoring seven goals in their first two games, the Bruins scored just five goals in their last four.
They were never shutout, and Sean Kuraly made sure of it in Game 4, but the only time they scored more than one goal in their last four games was their overtime win in Game 5.
âGoing to the tough areas, itâs always been, all year, a little bit of an issue. But we always found ways to score goals 5-on-5, and also on the power play,â Marco Sturm said. âWhat I really noticed is if you look around [the] playoffs now, how goals get scored, everything is in the paint. For some reason, we didnât get there. We didnât get those, we call it âgarbage goals,â [that] we needed this time of year. It was just not enough, and if you look at Buffalo, thatâs where they scored a lot of goals.â
Image courtesy of Natural Stat Trick
The Bruins were outshot 190-151 in the first round, and they were outscored 20-12. In all situations, the Sabres had 81 high-danger chances to the Bruinsâ 62.
The Bruins had no high-danger chances in the third period of Game 6.
David Pastrnak led the team with seven points (3-4â7), Morgan Geekie was in second with four (2-2â4).
The Bruins went 2-for-16 (12.5%) on the man-advantage during the series. In the regular season, the Bruins had the ninth-best power play, and it was in the top three when the NHL took a break for the Olympics.
It never returned to form after the break, and that carried into the postseason.
David Pastrnak scored a garbage-time power-play goal at the end of Game 1, and Pavel Zacha scored one in Game 2, then the power play went silent. The Bruins finished the series without a goal on any of their last nine power play attempts.
The Bruins had two power play chances in the third period of Game 3 while chasing one goal. They recorded five shots but did not beat Alex Lyon on any. The Bruins never beat Lyon on the power play.
They went 0-for-4 in Game 3 and 0-for-3 in Game 5.
Though there were a few penalties that the Bruins drew, they did not get an opportunity on the man-advantage in Game 6.
This one came back to bite.
Ahead of the series, Marco Sturm said the Bruins were the âbigger, stronger, and more physicalâ team. He was not speaking out of line; thatâs the Bruinsâ identity, itâs not Buffaloâs.
But the Sabres heard that message and took it personally.
The Bruins (1,861) ranked sixth in hits during the regular season; the Sabres ranked 24th (1,575). Yes, the Bruins threw more hits than the Sabres in Round 1, but the Sabres dictated the physicality from the jump.
The Sabres started by controlling the physical play in the series. Whether it was outhitting the Bruins or taking runs at Jeremy Swayman, the Sabres baited the Bruins into taking penalties, and it knocked the Bruins off their game.
The Bruins finally regained the physical edge in Games 4, 5, and 6, but two of those were in losing efforts.
Zadorov also said that the Bruins should have won Game 1 and played âreally wellâ for 55 minutes.
The Bruins scored first three times this series, but only won one of those games (Game 2).
Tage Thompson had the best individual game of the series in Game 1, scoring twice in the third period to lift the Sabres ahead of the Bruins. The Bruins carried a 2-0 lead into the final 10 minutes of the game, but watched their lead evaporate in a 6:46 span.
The Bruins only entered the third period trailing twice and could not mount a comeback either time.
The Sabres outscored the Bruins 12-4 in the third period.
Lindy Ruffâs top line of Tage Thompson, Alex Tuch, and Peyton Krebs showed up in the first round. According to Natural Stat Trick, they were on the ice for six Sabres goals at 5-on-5; they were not on the ice for a Bruins goal.
Tuch led the series with four goals; both he and Thompson had seven points. Krebs had six points. The Bruins did not have an answer to the top line. All season long, it was the second line that handled those matchups, but Viktor Arvidssonâs injury forced Marco Sturmâs hand with his lines.
Tuch and Krebs also finished with a series-high plus-8, while Thompson was a plus-7. Charlie McAvoy was a minus-6, David Pastrnak and Pavel Zacha were both minus-7.
Yes, the Sabres were the better team, but the Bruins had chances they did not take, and ultimately, it led to a disappointing end to an exciting season.
The post What Went Wrong For the Bruins in the First Round appeared first on Boston Hockey Now.