
The Seattle Seahawks did not give Sam Darnold a pay raise after their Super Bowl 60 victory, despite fans' expectations. The decision aligns with the franchise's philosophy regarding player contracts.

Why Seahawks did not reward Sam Darnold with a pay raise for Super Bowl win originally appeared on The Sporting News. Add The Sporting News as a Preferred Source by clicking here.
The Seattle Seahawks won Super Bowl 60, and they did so after signing Sam Darnold for a relatively cheap deal in free agency compared to what other Super Bowl-winning QBs are making.
And after the Super Bowl win, it was a natural wonder for fans if the Seahawks would reward Darnold as the Philadelphia Eagles did with Saquon Barkley last year after their Super Bowl win.
However, the Seahawks did not extend Darnold or give him a pay raise. ESPN's Dan Graziano revealed why the Seahawks made this decision, and it's a reasonable answer for the franchise's philosophy.
"With two years left on the contract, sure, the Seahawks could have extended him," Graziano writes. "But that would have gone against the very principles that, they believe, helped them build a Super Bowl champion roster."
The Seahawks chose not to extend Darnold's contract or increase his pay, following their franchise philosophy on player contracts.
The Philadelphia Eagles rewarded Saquon Barkley with a pay raise after their Super Bowl victory, contrasting with the Seahawks' decision regarding Darnold.
Darnold's contract was relatively inexpensive compared to other Super Bowl-winning quarterbacks, highlighting the Seahawks' strategic approach to player salaries.


What should the Panthers hope for in their 2026 schedule release?
Nekias Duncan and Steve Jones break down NBA playoffs and WNBA opening weekend!
Caia Elisaldez joins Wisconsin women's basketball, bringing experience and confidence.
Detroit Lions finalize contracts with all 2026 draft picks, including Blake Miller's $21.3M deal.
See every story in Sports — including breaking news and analysis.
Seattle did not spend a ton on the quarterback position, giving Darnold a $33.5 million per-year deal that was cheap enough that they could still go out and sign Cooper Kupp and DeMarcus Lawrence in free agency.
This roster-building philosophy worked out great for the Seahawks in 2025, so why would they change it up just because they won the Super Bowl?
And, while Darnold helped them get to the Super Bowl and win their second title, it's not like he won Super Bowl MVP and was the sole reason for their success.
When the Eagles spent the extra money on Barkley, it was because he recorded the most rushing yards of any player in a single season (regular season and playoffs). Darnold didn't set any records, nor was he the sole reason for their success this past year.
He was a big contributor and is more than deserving of the $4 million in incentives he got for this Super Bowl-winning season. But when it comes to landing a big extension, the Seahawks team-building philosophy doesn't include such a pay raise.
The Seahawks don't want to overspend on a QB, unless that QB was in the Patrick Mahomes, Lamar Jackson, or Josh Allen tier of QBs.
Darnold is a good QB, but not in the same category as those perennial MVP candidates. So, even though he might've deserved a pay raise, the Seahawks team-building philosophy doesn't include paying a QB like Darnold that much money.