Why Seahawks did not reward Sam Darnold with a pay raise for Super Bowl win

Seattle did not spend a ton on the quarterback position, giving Darnold a $33.5 million per-year deal that was cheap enough that they could still go out and sign Cooper Kupp and DeMarcus Lawrence in free agency.

This roster-building philosophy worked out great for the Seahawks in 2025, so why would they change it up just because they won the Super Bowl?

And, while Darnold helped them get to the Super Bowl and win their second title, it's not like he won Super Bowl MVP and was the sole reason for their success.

MORE: Seahawks extend Jaxon Smith-Njigba to record-setting $168.6 million deal

When the Eagles spent the extra money on Barkley, it was because he recorded the most rushing yards of any player in a single season (regular season and playoffs). Darnold didn't set any records, nor was he the sole reason for their success this past year.

He was a big contributor and is more than deserving of the $4 million in incentives he got for this Super Bowl-winning season. But when it comes to landing a big extension, the Seahawks team-building philosophy doesn't include such a pay raise.

The Seahawks don't want to overspend on a QB, unless that QB was in the Patrick Mahomes, Lamar Jackson, or Josh Allen tier of QBs.

Darnold is a good QB, but not in the same category as those perennial MVP candidates. So, even though he might've deserved a pay raise, the Seahawks team-building philosophy doesn't include paying a QB like Darnold that much money.

More Seahawks news:

• Rashid Shaheed for $51 million might be an overpay for the Seahawks
• Cooper Kupp is Seahawks most overpaid player
• Seahawks match Jaguars offer sheet to bring Jake Bobo back to Seattle
• Seahawks trade idea would net Myles Garrett in Super Bowl favorites move