
Men's college basketball buzz: State of blueblood rebuilds
Men's college basketball bluebloods like Kansas and Kentucky face major rebuilds this offseason.
The article discusses potential center prospects for the Washington Commanders in the 2026 NFL Draft. It highlights players that could significantly impact the team's offensive line.
JACKSONVILLE, FL - NOVEMBER 01: Florida Gators offensive lineman Jake Slaughter (66) lines up for a play during the game between the Florida Gators and the Georgia Bulldogs on November 1, 2025 at EverBank Field in Jacksonville, Fl. (Photo by David Rosenblum/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images) | Icon Sportswire via Getty Images
Last, but not least in the series of draft position roundup is Center.
Center
Adam Peters was active in the first wave of free agency, with multiple additions on defense and offensive skill positions. The two biggest remaining needs he was unable to address were Wide Receiver and Center. Washington was reportedly in the bidding for premium targets WR Alec Pierce and C Tyler Linderbaum, but fell short of the massive price tags that each player commanded.
The article outlines several center prospects, including Jake Slaughter from the Florida Gators, who could be valuable additions for the Commanders.
Strengthening the center position is crucial for improving the offensive line and overall team performance, especially given the team's current needs.
In addition to centers, the Commanders are also evaluating wide receivers and cornerbacks as part of their draft strategy.
The exact date for the 2026 NFL Draft has not been specified, but it typically occurs in late April each year.

Men's college basketball bluebloods like Kansas and Kentucky face major rebuilds this offseason.

Buffalo Sabres defeat Boston Bruins 4-3 in Game 1, ending 14-season playoff drought!

Catch up on Week 10 college baseball: top 25 rankings and highlights!

Trent Williams signs a $50M extension with the 49ers, making NFL history!

Key Factors in the Premier League Title Race: Arsenal vs. Man City
Azhar Mahmood defends Babar Azam, citing lack of aggressive batters in Pakistan.
See every story in Sports â including breaking news and analysis.
That leaves the Commanders heading into the draft with veteran backup Nick Allegretti pencilled in as the starting center. Dan Quinn has affirmed the teamâs trust in the seven year vet, who has mainly played backup guard, and occasional emergency replacement center. But it wouldnât be a surprise if the Commanders look to the draft and post-draft free agency to find more competition and potential upgrades at the position.
The 2026 draft class has been described as deep at the position. The consensus draft board lists 22 interior offensive linemen who have entered the draft as centers. And there are a few additional players seeking to switch from other positions. However, there are currently no experienced center prospects with consensus top-50 projections. Like most years, there are several prospects who could earn starting jobs this season, and one or two probably will. But fans might want to temper expectations of the team drafting a Day 1 starter to send Allegretti back to the bench in training camp.
Some common themes in draft profiles of many of the top ranked prospects were short arms and average play strength. However, as Hogs Havenâs LA Skin noted in a recent draft profile for one of the prospects, I have to wonder if the media analysts who write these profiles are fully across the size of centers in todayâs NFL, and particularly those who play in zone-heavy schemes. Every prospect under 310 lbs and/or 33â arm length seems to get labelled âundersizedâ, which is setting the expectation on the high side. And the expectations for play strength seem to be set on centers in gap-blocking schemes or guards.
For this round-up I used advanced blocking metrics, along with athletic testing results and draft profiles from around the internet to identify center prospects who suit a zone-heavy blocking scheme, with potential to earn a starting role at some point in their NFL journey. I was also guided by the Commandersâ prospect visit schedule.
More so than for any of the previous position roundups, I found there was frequently disagreement between the different sources of information on individual prospects. I did my best to synthesize and reconcile what different channels were telling me, and have indicated where I was left with lingering uncertainty.
âAdvanced Metricsâ sounds fancy, but it really just means metrics that are derived from film breakdown, as opposed to standard stats reported by the NFL, which are mainly derived from where the refs spot the ball on the field. This roundup relied heavily on two performance metrics sourced from Pro Football Focus.
Pass Protection â Pressure Rate
Pressure Rate is the percentage of Pressure Opportunities on which the blocker allowed a pressure (Sack, QB hit, QB hurry). Pressure Opportunities are non-spike passing snaps on plays that were not negated by penalties.
As an alternative to purely subjective analysis of technique to attempt to identify the best pass blockers, Pressure Rate focuses on the results of the blocking process. It still has a significant subjective component, because it relies on human observers to score pressures. But variability and bias are mitigated through PFFâs quality assurance process, which you donât usually get with film breakdowns from individual analysts.
The following table shows the Pressure Rate benchmarks for NCAA centers. Center prospects in this roundup were ranked against two different cohorts: the 22 center prospects listed on the consensus board, and 166 FBS centers who played a minimum of 200 blocking snaps in 2025. Not surprisingly, blocking metrics for consensus-ranked draft prospects were higher as a group than those for all FBS centers.
Run Blocking â PFF Run Blocking Grades
I have yet to find a truly satisfying analytical metric for run blocking by NCAA players. In the absence of a better alternative, I used PFF Run Blocking Grades. My past attempts to cross-validate PFF blocking grades for NFL players against different metrics, such as SIS Blown Blocks, have shown very strong correlation between different metrics from different sources, which provides some level of reassurance. And PFF grades do have the advantages of being derived through a quality assured process for all NCAA players, in every game, to provide a large sample for analytical comparisons with the players we are interested in.
Run Blocking Grade benchmarks for the center class are provided in the following table:
Trench Explosion Formula (TEF)
Lastly, thanks to a tip from LA Skin, I also used TEF values as a secondary athleticism metric, after RAS and individual athletic testing numbers. The TEF is a metric developed by the Seahawks Draft Blog to measure explosiveness of OL prospects, which you can read about here. It combines vertical jump, broad jump and bench press measures into a single metric, which is intended to identify OL prospects with the desired explosiveness for the NFL. Values over 3.0 indicate an explosive player, and values around 2.5 in the current sample seem to indicate more plodding types. As an aside, it is a mystery to me why bench press reps are included, since that is more of a measure of endurance than explosiveness.
Prospects are listed in order of consensus ranks, not order of preference. When available, Hogs Haven draft profiles are linked to the playerâs name.
iOL Keylan Rutledge, Senior, Georgia Tech
6-4 | 316 lbs | 33.25â arms | RAS 9.53 | TEF 2.98 | Age 22
2025 Stats: 13 Games | 872 Blk Snps | 1.4% Pressure Rate | 0 Sacks | 76.8 Run Blk Grade
Consensus Rank:Â 55
Commandersâ Meetings: None
Rutledge was featured in the Week 9 edition of Future Hogs. He is a big, nasty bully of an interior blocker. He took 98% of his snaps at right guard in college, and not one at center. But he worked out at center, to showcase his versatility to NFL scouts at the Senior Bowl, and has continued to do so throughout the draft process.
Rutledge has the power to move defensive tackles out of the way. He ragdolls linebackers, if he gets his hands on them. He looks to finish defenders through the whistle, and ends a lot of reps with opponents on the ground. He is exceptionally athletic for a player his size, with the combination of power and movement skills to excel in any blocking scheme. His Pressure Rate allowed in pass protections slots in between the 5th and 6th consensus-ranked centers in the draft class. And he is a road grader in the running game.
Rutledge would be a premium option if Adam Peters acquires a second round pick in a trade. He could be an instant upgrade over whomever the Commanders were planning to start at left guard, with potential to become a transformative addition at center, once he masters the position. However, that might be a pipedream, because it would be unusual for the Commanders to draft a player on Day 2 whom they havenât met.
Connor Lew, Junior, Auburn
6-3.5 | 310 lbs | 32.4â arms | Age 20.6
2025 Stats: 7 Games | 420 Blk Snps | 1.75% Pressure Rate | 2 Sacks | 64.9 Run Blk Grade
Consensus Rank:Â 66
Commandersâ Meetings: None
Connor Lew in the youngster in a center class of old me. He has the highest consensus rank in the class. He was a three year starter for Auburn, until his junior season was cut short by an ACL tear in Week 8. Nevertheless, he declared for the draft, despite still being under 21.
The consensus of draft anlysts is that he is an athletic, and powerful blocker who is solid in protection and proficient, but unimpressive in the run game (e.g. The Ringer, NFL.com, Dane Brugler â paywall). Most see him fitting a zone blocking scheme. But the recent Hogs Have profile by LA Skin (linked at the top), with detailed tape breakdown, raises questions about whether there is sufficient evidence from his experience in Auburnâs blocking scheme to support that conclusion.
The numbers support the consensus opinion that he is better in pass protection than run blocking, but fall well short of portraying the best center in the draft class. His Pressure Rate allowed in pass protection ranked 9th best among 22 consensus-ranked center prospects, and fell at the 85th percentile of FBS centers. His Run Blocking Grade ranked 17th/22 consensus-ranked centers, and placed him around the 63rd percentile in the FBS.
At just 20 years old, he looks like a developmental prospect, with tools to develop, and the potential to add muscle to his frame. But the fact that he is not a better run blocker at his size is a concern. Iâve put him behind the next two prospects on my board, and could consider dropping him even further.
Sam Hecht, Senior, Kansas State
6-4 | 303 lbs | 31.6â arms | RAS 7.76 | TEF 2.98 | Age 23
2025 Stats: 12 Games | 759 Blk Snps | 1.85% Pressure Rate | 0 Sacks | 77.7 Run Blk Grade
Consensus Rank:Â 84
Commandersâ Meetings: Senior Bowl
Hecht is a technically proficient, well-rounded center, with good fundamentals to go with better than average athleticism. His TEF value falls just short of the arbitrary threshold for explosive linemen. His main limitations are short arms, which put him at a disadvantage to longer defenders, and just adequate play strength.
He was able to compensate for his athletic limitations with refined blocking technique to achieve good productivity at the collegiate level. His 1.85% Pressure Rate in pass protection placed him at the 83rd percentile of FBS centers, but only ranked 10th out of 22 consensus-ranked centers, placing him right on the high side of median in the draft class. Â His Run Blocking Grade was the 6th highest out of 166 FBS centers (96th percentile).
Hecht profiles as an NFL ready center to compete with Nick Allegretti for the starting job in camp. He probably has the highest floor of true centers in the draft class. But there might be players with more upside.
Jake Slaughter, 5th Year Senior, Florida
6-4.9 | 303 lbs | 32.4â arms | RAS 9.97 | Age 23
2025 Stats: 12 Games | 748 Blk Snps | 1.00% Pressure Rate | 1 Sack | 80.2 Run Blk Grade
Consensus Rank:Â 107
Commandersâ Meetings: Senior Bowl
Slaughter has good size and adequate arm length for the position, but just average play strength. He posted speed and elite explosiveness testing numbers at the combine. Hogs Havenâs Mark Tyler identified him as a player who ticks the boxes for an Adam Peters draft pick.
Slaughter is a high IQ player with excellent awareness to identify stunts and adjust protections. He is a quick processor with speed to reach targets at the second level. His anchor in pass protection is better than youâd expect, given comments about mediocre play strength.
Slaughter has the best combination of blocking metrics in the draft class. His 1.00% Pressure Rate in pass protection placed 2nd among ranked draft prospects and was 4th best among 166 FBS centers (98th percentile). His Run Blocking grade ranked 2nd in the draft class, and among all FBS centers (99th percentile).
He could be a seriously underrated prospect. If he can get stronger, with time in an NFL training program, he has potential to be a very good starter.
Logan Jones, 5th Year Senior, Iowa
6-2.9 | 299 lbs | 30.75â arms | RAS 9.63 | TEF 3.17 (proj) | Age 24
2025 Stats: 13 Games | 766 Blk Snps | 0.93% Pressure Rate | 1 Sack | 73.0 Run Blk Grade
Consensus Rank:Â 100
Commandersâ Meetings: None
Jones is on the smaller side for center prospects, with elite athleticism, and tiny T-Rex arms. But no one ever said he needs to get stronger. He plays with sound fundamentals and has the skillset to suit a zone blocking scheme
Jones is a mauler, who makes up for smaller size, to some extent, with incredible strength and tenacity.
The consensus among tape watchers is that he is further along in run blocking than pass protection. But the numbers tell a different story. Despite the size and short arms, he allowed the lowest Pressure Rate on passing downs in the center draft class. In 336 dropbacks, Jones allowed just 3 total pressures, including 1 sack. He wasnât bad at run blocking, either. His Run Blocking grade ranked 6th among consensus-ranked prospects and placed him at the 88th percentile of FBS centers.
At 25 this season, he is probably maxed out physically. He is not going to get any longer, and it would be hard to get any stronger. He looks like a plug and play starter in a zone blocking front, but might always be vulnerable to large and long-limbed interior defenders.
OT/C Brian Parker II, Redshirt Junior, Duke
6-5 | 309 lbs | 32.9â arms | RAS 9.13 | Age 22
2025 Stats: 13 Games | 902 Blk Snps | (4.0% Pressure Rate at OT) | 3 Sacks | 83.9 Run Blk Grade
Consensus Rank:Â 116
Commandersâ Meetings: East-West Shrine
Parker is one of my favorite prospects for the Commanders in the draft class. He played OT at Duke, but is switching to center for the NFL, due to borderline length.
He is a feisty blocker, with great technique, body control and athleticism to overcome average length and play strength. He is a skilled zone blocker with speed and technique to reach targets at the second level.
Parkerâs Pressure Rate and Run Blocking grades are not comparable to the centers because he played a different position. OTs give up twice the rate of pressure as iOL. He graded well for an OT.
Parker will take time to learn the position, but has upside to become a better than average starting center, with versatility to play other OL positions as well.
OT/C Trey Zuhn III, 5th Year Senior, Texas A&M
6-6.5 | 312 lbs | 32.5â arms | RAS 9.96 | TEF 3.34 (Rk2) | Age 23.5
2025 Stats: 13 Games | 776 Blk Snps | (2.4% Pressure Rate at OT) | 1 Sack | 81.9 Run Blk Grade (Rk 1)
Consensus Rank:Â 126
Commandersâ Meetings: Senior Bowl
Zuhn started four seasons at left tackle, and took 126 snaps at center in 2025, which some analysts say was his best tape. He is a tough evaluation because heâs switching position from OT to center for the NFL, and because analyst opinions are varied.
He is very large for a center, but has short arms in proportion to his frame. He tested in the elite range in speed and explosiveness drills at the Combine, but didnât do agility drills. His TEF score ranks him as the second most explosive lineman in the draft class.  He posted 33 bench press reps, but gets faulted for average play strength. There seems to be consensus that he has good handwork and initial quickness for a center, but itâs often hard to tell if analysts are rating him as a center or a tackle.
Unfortunately, the Pressure Rate and Run Block grades are not directly comparable to centers, because of the position switch. But the blocking numbers are very good for an OT.
He looks like a fit at center in a zone blocking scheme, with the possibility to raise his ceiling with more strength conditioning. Heâd be a developmental project for the Commanders. Iâm feeling more risk than Parker, but he seems to have the attributes to make the switch successfully.
Jager Burton, 5th Year Senior, Kentucky
6-4 | 312 lbs | 32.75â arms | RAS 9.88 | TEF 3.23 (Rk 3) | Age 23
2025 Stats: 12 Games | 819 Blk Snps | Pressure Rate 2.82% | 0 Sacks | 67.5 Run Blk Grade
Consensus Rank:Â 173
Commandersâ Meetings: Team Pro Day
Burton is similar to Zuhn in many ways, except that he has five years experience playing center with four as a starter, and has played all three iOL positions. He has good size for a center with nearly average arm length, and very good to elite Combine testing numbers. He had the third highest TEF score in the OL class, but analysts fault him for limited play strength.
The tape watchers agree that he is a good fit to a zone blocking scheme, with great burst to pull and good execution reaching targets at the second level. His anchor in pass pro is adequate.
But his blocking numbers are a step down from the centers ranked above him. His Pressure Rate in pass protection ranked 18th among 22 consensus-ranked centers, and was at 49th percentile of qualifying FBS centers. His Run Blocking grade was better, ranking 6th among consensus-ranked centers and 76th percentile in the FBS.
He looks like a backup entering the league, with athletic tools to develop. If he can get stronger and improve his pass protection, he has a path to push for starting time. But itâs fair question how much developmental potential a 23 year old with four years starting experience has left ahead of him.
Parker Brailsford, Junior, Alabama
6-1.9 | 289 lbs | 32â arms | RAS 8.65 | TEF 3.35 (Rk 1) | Age 22
2025 Stats: 14 Games | 905 Blk Snps | Pressure Rate 2.55% | 1 Sack | 60.0 Run Blk Grade
Consensus Rank:Â 178
Commandersâ Meetings: None
Brailsford is the Little Engine that Could of the center class. I was going to leave him out, because of his size. But the recent Hogs Haven profile by LA Skin forced me to look a little deeper. I wonât bother to paraphrase LAâs detailed film breakdown. Just click the link above.
LAâs film analysis convinced me that Brailsford has the competitive demeanor, athleticism, skills and play smarts to overcome his size limitations. But the blocking numbers pulled me back. His Pressure Rate in pass protection ranked 15th out of 22 consensus-ranked prospects, and around 61st percentile of FBS centers. His Run Blocking Grade ranked 20th among consensus ranked players and was 28th percentile in the FBS.
While Brailsford overachieves for his size, he might be facing too big an obstacle to overcome in the NFL. If he went undrafted, I would consider switching him to interior pass rusher, where his explosive athleticism and understanding of blocking schemes might give him an advantage. But there are better options for the Commanders at center in the draft class.
Matt Gulbin C, 5th Year Senior, Michigan State
6-4 | 305 lbs | 31.75â arms | RAS 3.46 | TEF 2.50 | Age 23.4
2025 Stats: 11 Games | 727 Blk Snps | Pressure Rate 1.23% (Rk 4) | 2 Sacks | 81.9 Run Blk Grade
Consensus Rank:Â 181
Commandersâ Meetings: None
Gulbin is another difficult evaluation. He looks good on film for an inside zone blocking scheme, and the blocking performance numbers are outstanding. But the lack of length and atrocious athletic testing numbers cast some doubts about how well his game will translate to the pro level.
He has good size for a center, but short arms.  He tested very poorly in agility testing at the combine (4.96 sec shuttle, 8.33 sec 3-cone), as well as the broad jump (8â5â) and the bench (21 reps). The bench performance seems at odds with the consensus opinion that he has good play strength. The 5.30 sec 40 at his pro day didnât help matters.
But maybe he is one of those guys who has overcover athletic limitations through sheer determination and technical perfection. His performance numbers demand attention. Gulbinâs Pressure Rate in pass protection ranked 4th among consensus-ranked centers and 96th percentile in the FBS. His Run Blocking Grade was the highest in the draft class and the FBS.
According to PFF, Gulbin had a 191 to 77 split between zone and gap concepts on run blocking downs. How a player with such poor athletic testing numbers could perform so well at zone blocking is a mystery that is beyond my expertise to figure out. The fact that the Commanders havenât scheduled a meeting with him suggests that I might not have to.
Nick Dawkns, 5th Year Senior, Penn State
6-4 | 305 lbs | 33.75â arms | RAS 9.77 | Age 24
2025 Stats: 11 Games | 723 Blk Snps | Pressure Rate 1.73% | 2 Sacks | 68.3 Run Blk Grade
Consensus Rank:Â 435
Commandersâ Meetings: American Bowl
Dawkins is a potential late round/undrafted diamond in the rough I found by scrolling through the Commandersâ meeting list. What caught the scoutsâ eye to schedule a meeting with a player who has flown completely under the media radar?
Dawkins comes from an NFL family, with a cousin in Canton and another starting at LT for the Bills. According to the home town press, it took him three years to work his way up the Penn State depth chart. His hard work earned him team captain honors in his final two years as the starter. He also earned the moniker âMayor of State Collegeâ for his role in the Penn State community, along with the Allstate Wuerffel Trophy and Allstate Good Works Team Captain award, recognizing his achievement founding the Dawkins Family Foundation to champion academic and athletic excellence for young students.
On the field, Dawkins played a big part in the success of running backs Kaytron Allen and Nick Singleton, who will be heading to the NFL later this week. He also held his own in pass protection. According to Jimmy Williams of Draft Diamonds, Dawkinsâ game is powered by explosiveness and exceptional strength, which is supported by his testing numbers.
In 2025, he split rushing reps 226:116 between gap and zone concepts. According to Williams, he thrives on inside zone runs, where he generates movement, with length and mobility to reach, seal, and climb effectively to the second level.
The blocking performance metrics show him to be significantly above average in both phases. His Pressure Rate in pass protection ranked 7th among consensus-ranked centers and was at the 87th percentile among FBS centers. His Run Blocking Grade ranked 10th out of 22 consensus ranked centers and was at the 78th percentile in the FBS.
Despite the lack of media attention, Dawkins stands out in the center draft class for his character and leadership off the field, and his strength and length, which are weaknesses for many of the more highly ranked prospects. He seems like a player who will appeal to the front office and coaching staff, if his game tape measures up. He should be available in the seventh round or after the draft.