Former Indiana basketball players are appealing a District Court's dismissal of their lawsuit against the school for alleged mistreatment by a former team physician. The dismissal was based on a statute of limitations and jurisdictional issues.
Key points
Former Indiana basketball players filed a lawsuit against the school.
The lawsuit alleged mistreatment by former team physician Brad Bomba Sr.
A federal judge dismissed the case due to statute of limitations and jurisdictional issues.
The players are appealing the dismissal to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.
Attorney Kathleen DeLaney is representing the plaintiffs.
Mentioned in this story
Brad Bomba Sr.Kathleen DeLaney
Indiana basketball
Players suing Indiana appealing District Court decision to dismiss case
BLOOMINGTON â The former Indiana basketball players who filed a lawsuit against the school alleging mistreatment by former team physician Brad Bomba Sr. have appealed the recent District Court decision dismissing the case, per a release from their attorney Kathleen DeLaney.
A federal judge issued an order on April 1 dismissing the class action lawsuit on grounds the playersâ claims were subject to a two-year statute of limitations that long-since passed. The other state law complaints in the lawsuit filed were dismissed on jurisdictional grounds.
The plaintiffs had a right to appeal the ruling to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals within 30 days.
Former IU players, including Haris Mujezinovic, along with Charlie Miller, filed the lawsuit in Oct. 2024, alleging they were "routinely and repeatedly" subject to "medically unnecessary, invasive and sexually abusive rectal examinations" by basketball team physician Dr. Brad Bomba Sr.
Mujezinovic and Miller were joined in the lawsuit by fellow former Indiana players John Flowers and Larry Richardson Jr. in subsequent filings with the court. Garl, who was Bombaâs supervisor at the time of the alleged incidents, was added as a defendant in the case.
"I continue to be amazed that Indiana University has not taken ownership of this problem like Michigan State, Penn State, and to some degree Ohio State did," Mujezinovic, said in Thursday's press release. "Nobody disputes what happened to us, yet they refuse to fix the problem.â
Indiana hired Jones Day, an international law firm with experience in sensitive investigations, to conduct an independent investigation into the allegations. Those findings were released to the public last May in the form of an 874-page report.
Q&A
What was the reason for the dismissal of the Indiana basketball players' lawsuit?
The lawsuit was dismissed due to the players' claims being subject to a two-year statute of limitations that had expired and jurisdictional issues with state law complaints.
How long do the players have to appeal the District Court's decision?
The players had 30 days to appeal the ruling to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.
Who is representing the former Indiana basketball players in their appeal?
The players are represented by attorney Kathleen DeLaney in their appeal against the District Court's decision.
Related Articles
Sports
LIV Golf is still going, but its days seem numbered and probably always were
LIV Golf's future appears uncertain as reports suggest Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund may withdraw funding after investing $5 billion. Despite assurances for the 2026 season, the tour faces challenges from low ratings and strong competition from the PGA Tour.
ESPN News··1 min read
MLB·Recap
Angels' Mike Trout hits another HR to join Aaron Judge in rare Yankee Stadium history
Mike Trout's 446-foot HR joins him with Aaron Judge in Yankee Stadium lore.
Yahoo Sports··1 min read
MLB·Feature
Tigers projected to take a gamble on the upside of a 6'3" prep bat
Detroit Tigers projected to take a risk on a 6'3" prep bat in the MLB draft.
See every story in Sports â including breaking news and analysis.
Jones Day's investigation concluded Bomba did not act in "bad faith" or "improper purpose" in conducting digital rectal examinations (DREs) as a routine part of his annual physical examinations (PPEs).
âWe are proud of our clients for their commitment and courage in continuing to seek justice from Indiana University and its former Head Athletic Trainer," DeLaney said. "We have established through the discovery process that Dr. Bomba, Sr. performed a DRE during every preparticipation physical he administered to players for nearly three decades and that the University and Garl knew it was happening and did nothing to stop it.â
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Chicago will review the District Court's decision.
Michael Niziolek is the Indiana beat reporter for The Bloomington Herald-Times. You can follow him on X @michaelniziolek and read all his coverage by clicking here.