Prosecutors are defending blood test evidence in the case against Sean M. Higgins, accused of killing hockey player Johnny Gaudreau and his brother. They argue the defense's claims of flawed testing are based on one expert's opinion.
Mentioned in this story
Prosecutors are urging a judge to uphold charges against the driver accused of killing hockey star Johnny Gaudreau and his brother â pushing back on claims the blood evidence in the case is flawed.
In a new court filing, prosecutors are disputing allegations that blood tests of driver Sean M. Higgins failed to show he was intoxicated when he struck the NHL star and his brother as they bicycled along a rural road in Salem County in 2024.
Higginsâ attorneys want his indictment dismissed, arguing the grand jury was misled.
In their court filing, prosecutors stood behind their allegations that Higgins was drunk. They argued the defenseâs challenge of blood toxicology results is based on a single expertâs opinion.
âIt is only one chemistâs opinion attacking the credibility of one piece of the Stateâs evidence in this matter,â Assistant Prosecutor Michael Mestern wrote in the new brief made public on Monday.
The prosecution also argued that it has many ways of proving Higgins was reckless and showed an âextreme indifference to human lifeâ on the night of the crash.
The crash occurred around 8:15 p.m. on Aug. 29, 2024, as Johnny and Matthew Gaudreau bicycled together on Route 551/Pennsville-Auburn Road in Oldmans Township.
Higgins was arrested after he failed a field sobriety test.
He admitted drinking several beers before the crash and acknowledged drinking as he drove, according to police.
His blood was later taken at a hospital to measure his blood alcohol level.
The dispute centers around dueling claims over how the blood alcohol level was measured.
Prosecutors said Higginsâ blood alcohol concentration was measured at 0.087%, above the legal limit of 0.08%. But a defense expertâs review of the toxicology report determined his reading was actually 0.075%, below the legal limit.
The defense argued, instead of testing a whole blood sample from Higgins, a sample of his blood serum was used.
Sean M. Higgins is charged with killing Johnny Gaudreau and his brother while allegedly intoxicated.
Prosecutors assert that the blood test results indicating Higgins was intoxicated are credible and challenge the defense's claims as based on a single expert's opinion.
Higgins' attorneys argue that the blood tests failed to show he was intoxicated and claim the grand jury was misled.
Johnny Gaudreau and his brother were struck by Sean M. Higgins while biking along a rural road in Salem County.
LIV Golf's New Orleans event set for June 25 is postponed amid financial concerns.
Red Sox's Alex Cora Fired: Who's Next on the Hot Seat in MLB?
See every story in Sports â including breaking news and analysis.
The defense previously referred to the sample tested as plasma, but its latest brief uses the term serum. Blood serum is the clear, yellowish liquid that remains after blood clots.
Experts say a whole blood sample is preferred when testing for intoxication. That is because alcohol readings in serum samples alone are usually higher than in whole blood.
When whole blood is not tested, a conversion formula recognized under state law is used to get an accurate blood alcohol concentration figure, the defense said in its argument.
That formula was not applied in Higginsâ case, the defense said. If it was applied, his reading would have been the lower 0.075% figure, they alleged.
Gaudreau brothers
Higgins, 45, of Pilesgrove, was indicted on two counts of first-degree aggravated manslaughter, two counts of second-degree reckless vehicular homicide, second-degree leaving the scene of a fatal accident and fourth-degree tampering with physical evidence.
He faces up to 70 years in prison.
By telling the grand jury that Higgins was legally intoxicated, the prosecution allowed jurors to draw incorrect conclusions about his recklessness, his attorneys said.
âIn circumstances where the Stateâs presentation creates a misleading factual framework that shapes the grand juryâs evaluation of probable cause, the resulting indictment cannot be allowed to stand,â they wrote.
In its new brief, the prosecution challenged the claim that the defense expertâs conclusion proved Higgins was not intoxicated.
The prosecution has evidence that refutes the defense opinion and will argue that matter if the case goes to trial, Mestern, the assistant prosecutor, wrote in the brief.
The prosecution also said the defense was arguing that prosecutors should have presented the defense expertâs report to the grand jury, even though that report arrived 14 months after the case was presented to the grand jury.
The defendantâs blood alcohol level is just one of several ways the prosecution can prove Higginsâ recklessness, Mestern said.
In the new brief, the prosecutor pointed to witness statements that Higgins was driving recklessly, that the Gaudreaus were not riding in the lane of travel, that Higgins didnât stop to assist the brothers after hitting them, and that Higgins admitted to police he was drinking before and while he was driving that day.
Neither side has revealed why Higginsâ whole blood was not tested. The dismissal motion is scheduled to be argued on May 11.
On the night of the crash, New Jersey State Police troopers took Higgins to a hospital where a nurse performed the blood draw, according to a police report.
A trooper provided the nurse with a police blood draw kit and watched as two vials of blood were drawn. After sealing the second tube, the nurse told the trooper the seal on one of the vials may be defective, police said.
The trooper retrieved another kit from his vehicle and the nurse drew two more vials.
The four vials were packaged, taken to the State Police Woodstown Station and placed in an evidence refrigerator. It was sent for testing to a State Police lab.
The first kit was not tested but the second was used to produce the 0.087% blood alcohol level reading, the defense said.
In addition to arguing for dismissal of the entire indictment, the defense presented an alternate argument to dismiss just the aggravated manslaughter counts against him.
Proving those charges requires evidence that Higgins showed extreme indifference to human life.
âThe evidence presented to the grand jury does not demonstrate conduct approaching this heightened level of culpability,â the defense wrote.
On the day of the crash, the roadway was unlit and dark and the Gaudreaus were cycling without helmets, reflective gear or state-required lights on their bikes, the defense said in its brief.
Also, the brothers were intoxicated at the time, the defense said.
Higgins was driving northbound and tried to pass vehicles in front of him, according to the prosecution.
He tried to illegally pass an SUV on the right and struck the Gaudreaus, prosecutors said. The brothers were riding their bikes single-file on the solid white line marking the edge of the roadway, according to witnesses.
Those witnesses described Higginsâ driving as erratic and reckless, and said his vehicle was partially on the grass when he hit the men.
Higginsâ Jeep came to a stop more than a quarter of a mile from the crash scene after the vehicle stalled, prosecutors said.
While the prosecution argued Higgins tried to leave the scene and could have stopped his vehicle sooner, his lawyers said he wasnât trying to flee.
The fatal crash stunned the hockey world and the South Jersey community where the brothers grew up.
Last month, the state Civil Service Commission upheld the firing of a morgue employee who was accused of leaking information about the Gaudreau brothersâ deaths.
Gaudreau brothers memorial
Read the original article on NJ.com. Add NJ.com as a Preferred Source by clicking here.