Schlotterbeck criticized by Dortmund fans for reportedly having a Real Madrid exit clause

DORTMUND, GERMANY - APRIL 11: Nico Schlotterbeck of Borussia Dortmund in action during the Bundesliga match between Borussia Dortmund and Bayer 04 Leverkusen at Signal Iduna Park on April 11, 2026 in Dortmund, Germany. (Photo by Dean Mouhtaropoulos/Getty Images) | Getty Images

Lothar Matthäus has publicly backed Nico Schlotterbeck following the backlash surrounding his recent contract extension with Borussia Dortmund, pushing back against criticism over a reported release clause tied to the deal.

Schlotterbeck recently committed his future to Dortmund until 2031, a move that would typically be celebrated. However, the reaction among sections of the fanbase has been mixed, largely due to reports in German media suggesting the presence of a €60 million release clause that could facilitate a summer departure.

Some supporters voiced their frustration over the weekend, even directing boos at the defender. Matthäus, speaking on Sky90, made it clear he sees the controversy as overblown.

“I don’t understand the debate at all,” Matthäus said, emphasizing that it’s natural for players to maintain flexibility—especially when elite clubs are involved. With Real Madrid reportedly interested, he argued that it’s only logical for Schlotterbeck to leave the door open for a potential future move.

Matthäus rejected the idea that such a clause signals a lack of commitment to Dortmund. In his view, Schlotterbeck can remain fully dedicated to the club while still preserving the option to take the next step in his career if the right opportunity arises.

“This doesn’t mean he doesn’t identify with Dortmund,” Matthäus explained. “It’s completely normal in today’s game.”

From Dortmund’s perspective, Matthäus also sees the renewal as a positive outcome. By extending Schlotterbeck’s contract, the club strengthens its position financially. Even if the player were to leave via a clause, the fee would still represent significant value—especially compared to the risk of losing him for less, or even for free, down the line.

Interestingly, Matthäus hinted that the release clause may not have originated from the player’s camp. According to him, the inclusion of such a provision was likely driven internally by the club as a way to secure Schlotterbeck’s signature amid uncertainty over his long-term future.