Stefon Diggs has been found not guilty of felony strangulation and misdemeanor assault related to a dispute with his private chef over unpaid services. The jury took less than two hours to reach the verdict.
Key points
Stefon Diggs found not guilty of felony strangulation
Also acquitted of misdemeanor assault and battery
Case involved a dispute over unpaid services with his chef
Jury deliberated for less than two hours
Diggs pleaded not guilty at his arraignment
Mentioned in this story
Stefon DiggsNew England Patriots
Super Bowl LX
Stefon Diggs wears a suit while sitting in a courtroom.
Former New England Patriots wide receiver Stefon Diggs listens to testimony during his trial in Dedham, Mass. on Tuesday. (Charles Krupa / Associated Press)
Free agent NFL receiver Stefon Diggs has been found not guilty of felony strangulation and not guilty of misdemeanor assault and battery in connection with an alleged dispute with his private chef over money she said he owed her for her services.
Diggs remained stoic in the courtroom as the verdicts were announced, following less that two hours of deliberation by the jury.
Diggs was charged Dec. 30 and pleaded not guilty during his arraignment at Massachusettsâ Dedham District Court on Feb. 13, five days after playing in Super Bowl LX with the New England Patriots.
Diggs did not take the stand during the trial, which started Monday in Norfolk County District Court in Dedham, Mass.
His accuser, Jamila Adams, told the jury that the 11-year NFL veteran âsmacked me with an open handâ and wrapped his arm around her neck during an incident that is alleged to have occurred at Diggsâ house on Dec. 2.
âWhen I went up to block him, he took his arms and came around my neck and he began to choke me,â said Adams, who became emotional during her testimony.
Defense attorney Andrew Kettlewell told jurors there was no evidence of an assault, with no one in the house reporting anything of the kind and no medical records, photos or video that documented any injuries.
Q&A
What were the charges against Stefon Diggs?
Stefon Diggs faced charges of felony strangulation and misdemeanor assault and battery.
How long did the jury deliberate before reaching a verdict in Diggs' case?
The jury deliberated for less than two hours before announcing their verdict.
What was the nature of the dispute involving Stefon Diggs and his private chef?
The dispute revolved around money that Diggs allegedly owed his private chef for her services.
When did Stefon Diggs plead not guilty to the charges?
Stefon Diggs pleaded not guilty during his arraignment on February 13.
Related Articles
Soccer·Feature
Momentum is shifting Arsenal's way â it could lead to two trophies
Arsenal has reached the Champions League final after defeating Atletico Madrid 1-0, securing a 2-1 aggregate victory. The atmosphere at the Emirates Stadium was electric as fans celebrated this significant achievement.
See every story in Sports â including breaking news and analysis.
Adams said she did not take any photos or video that showed any marks on her body that could be used as evidence because she "was in shock."
According to Adams, her employment dynamic with Diggs was "complicated." The two of them have known each other for more than four years, she said, and had previously been in a sexual relationship, although they were not at the time of the alleged assault. As Diggs' private chef, she lived in his home and prepared him meals and snacks, she said.
In reporting the alleged incident to police Dec. 16, Adams said she and Diggs had a dispute over payment she thought she was owed. Kettlewell told jurors that Adams had sought money from Diggs after reporting the alleged incident, in amounts that increased over time and culminated in her attorney seeking $5.5 million.
âShe was furious and she wanted Mr. Diggs to pay in every sense of that word,â Kettlewell said.
Asked Tuesday about the $5.5-million claim, Adams answered at various points, âI canât speak on that,â âI donât understand the questionâ and âI donât know how to answer the question.â
At times during the trial, Judge Jeanmarie Carroll instructed jurors to disregard parts of Adamsâ testimony that the judge said went beyond the scope of the questions.