‘The law states…’ – Ex-PGMOL chief weighs in over controversial moment in Liverpool defeat

Taking to X in quoting the Irishman’s analysis, the ex-Premier League referee stated:‘The law states that you cannot score a goal with your hand, even if considered accidental.’

Want more Empire of the Kop coverage? Add us as a preferred source on Google to your favourites list for news you can trust

Liverpool have justified cause for complaint

Hackett is indeed correct – as specified by IFAB), the handball rule states that ‘a handball offence is committed when a player (except the goalkeeper in their own penalty area)…scores a goal against the other team with their hand/arm or scores immediately after the ball has touched their hand/arm (even if the touch was accidental)’.

The contact off Sesko’s fingers may have been minimal, but by the definition stated above, the goal should technically have been disallowed.

Liverpool supporters will rightly point to a goal that Alexis Mac Allister had chalked off against Nottingham Forest in February when, from an attempted Ola Aina clearance, the ball struck his elbow with his back turned and trickled over the line.

In both cases, the contact with the ball was unintentional, but one of the goals was given and the other wasn’t. It’s exactly the kind of inconsistency which drives football fans absolutely spare.

The Reds should still have done a lot better in the lead-up to Sesko’s goal, but it’s also true that they have legitimate cause to feel aggrieved that it was allowed to stand. We can only hope that decision doesn’t cost us come the end of the season.