Sports
Former Raiders CB works out for the New York Giants
Sam Webb, former Raiders cornerback, works out for the Giants.
Yahoo Sports1 min read
Sports
The NCAA Investigation Trap: Why Honest Coaches Lose and Liars Win
TL;DR
The NCAA's leniency towards self-reporting coaches often backfires, leading to honest coaches facing harsher consequences. Historical outcomes reveal a pattern where dishonest coaches seem to benefit from the system.
Key points
- NCAA promises leniency for self-reporting coaches
- Honest coaches often face harsher consequences
- Historical outcomes reveal a pattern of dishonesty being rewarded
IOWA CITY, IA - SEPTEMBER 27: Head coach Kirk Ferentz and assistant head coach Seth Wallace of the Iowa Hawkeyes argue a call in the second half against the Indiana Hoosiers on September 27, 2025 at Kinnick Stadium, in Iowa City, Iowa. (Photo by Matthew Holst/Getty Images) | Getty Images
Leave it to the NCAA to do something so incredibly stupid I end up defending Kirk Ferentz.
The NCAA Investigation Trap: Why Honest Coaches Lose and Liars Win
The NCAA promises leniency to coaches who self-report violations and cooperate with investigators. It says so in its own official guidelines. But forty years of real outcomes tell a completely different story — and if you follow college football, you’ve watched it play out in plain sight without anyone connecting the dots.
The pattern works like this. A coach discovers a problem, reports it honestly, cooperates fully with investigators, and loses everything. His university voids his buyout. The NCAA issues a show cause penalty that makes him radioactive. Meanwhile, the coaches who cover things up, stonewall investigators, or simply flee to the NFL before the sanctions arrive face little to no personal consequence.
Jeremy Pruitt cooperated. He got a six-year show cause penalty and lost a $12.6 million buyout while Tennessee pocketed millions by avoiding a bowl ban. Jim Tressel concealed violations for months, signed a false compliance certification, then negotiated a quiet exit that led him to a university presidency. Pete Carroll left for Seattle five months before the NCAA finished its USC investigation and went on to win a Super Bowl.
Kirk Ferentz self-reported a tampering violation, self-imposed a suspension, and took full public ownership. The NCAA’s response in April 2026 was to vacate four wins and put an asterisk on his all-time record.
This isn’t a broken system producing random results. It’s a machine that functions exactly as designed — rewarding institutional self-interest and punishing individual honesty. Jim Wacker figured that out in 1985. Coaches are still learning the same lesson today.
The full breakdown, covering six coaches across four decades, is on the Hardcore College Football History YouTube channel now.
Q&A
How does the NCAA's self-reporting policy affect coaches?
The NCAA promises leniency to coaches who self-report violations, but historical outcomes show that honest coaches often face harsher penalties.
What are the consequences for coaches who lie during NCAA investigations?
Coaches who lie during investigations may escape severe penalties, creating a perception that dishonesty is rewarded in the NCAA system.
What historical patterns exist regarding NCAA investigations?
Over the past forty years, a consistent pattern has emerged where coaches who cooperate with investigations are often penalized more severely than those who do not.