
Acuerdo para la compra del Sevilla
Sergio Ramos cierra acuerdo para comprar el Sevilla tras reuniĂłn de dos horas.
WNBA Commissioner Cathy Engelbert addressed the rising costs of viewing games, stating that the pricing is controlled by media companies, not the league. She emphasized that the WNBA's situation is not unique in the competitive media landscape.
Mentioned in this story
Oct 3, 2025; Las Vegas, Nevada, USA; WNBA Commissioner Cathy Engelbert talks during a presser before the start of game one of the 2025 WNBA Finals between the Phoenix Mercury and the Las Vegas Aces at Michelob Ultra Arena. Mandatory Credit: Stephen R. Sylvanie-Imagn Images ©Stephen R. Sylvanie-Imagn Images
The WNBA is growing and making more money than ever before. For the fans, however, itâs also getting increasingly expensive trying to keep up with the league and watch games consistently across multiple platforms. But according to Cathy Engelbert, this is a problem that is largely beyond the WNBAâs control.
âIâm not running one of those media companies so I canât fix the cost thing.â This was Cathy Engelbertâs statement while addressing the rising cost of viewing games this season during her visit to Toronto for the new expansion teamâs first-ever regular season game. As she explained, the cost of watching games is ultimately controlled by the media companies themselves. And according to her, âItâs a free market that the U.S has in the media market because thereâs a lot of participants.â In fact, Cathy also believes that âThe WNBA is not unique in this battle.â
Cathy Engelbert also went further to explain why live sports have become so valuable in todayâs media landscape. In her exact words, âThat has been accretive to live sports keeping cable alive and live sports getting streamers.â What Engelbert essentially means is that while traditional cable television continues to lose viewers to streaming platforms, live sports remain one of the few types of content people still prefer watching in real time. As a result, both cable networks like ESPN and ABC, as well as streaming platforms like Amazon and Netflix, are aggressively competing for sports rights because sports continue to attract subscribers and keep audiences engaged. âItâs the one thing keeping everybody alive, quite frankly,â she added.
Cathy Engelbert stated that the rising costs of viewing WNBA games are largely controlled by media companies and are beyond the league's control.
Live sports are becoming more valuable because they are one of the few types of content that viewers prefer to watch in real time, helping to keep cable and streaming platforms competitive.
The WNBA's media rights deal is valued at $3.1 billion.
The WNBA faces challenges with increasing viewership costs as fans must navigate multiple platforms, which are influenced by the pricing strategies of various media companies.

Sergio Ramos cierra acuerdo para comprar el Sevilla tras reuniĂłn de dos horas.
Icon League play-ins saw two teams advance to semifinals with standout players!
Liverpool's contract talks with Ibrahima Konate face delays over financial details.
F1 eyes rescheduling Bahrain and Saudi Arabian GPs amid Gulf tensions
LeBron James hints at retirement but makes no announcement after Lakers' sweep
Catch Spurs vs. Timberwolves Game 5 tonight at 8 PM ET on ESPN!
See every story in Sports â including breaking news and analysis.
But as she also said, âThatâs a huge positive.â That is, the increased attention and value that live sports now carry means that leagues like the WNBA are making significantly more money from media rights deals. And of course, everything Cathy said is evident in the WNBAâs recent 11-year media rights agreement reportedly worth a massive $3.1 billion, involving partners such as Disney (ABC/ESPN), NBCUniversal (NBC/Peacock), Amazon (Prime Video), and Paramount Global (CBS), among others.
Comparing the finances to the WNBAâs previous agreement, the average annual value of the new media deal stands at roughly $281 million, which is about 6.5 times larger than the leagueâs previous deal. But according to Cathy, the challenge now is âmaking sure fans can find our games when they want to.â Because so many companies now own different broadcasting rights, games end up spread across multiple channels and streaming apps. That fragmentation can make the viewing experience confusing and expensive for fans even though it is financially beneficial for the league.
Cathy Engelbert does, however, believe that eventually some companies and services will likely merge together or bundle their offerings. In fact, according to her, that process has already started happening in parts of the media industry. As she said, âI do know there is going to have to be consolidation over time and youâve already seen some of that consolidation.â
For Cathy, it is indeed a problem that goes beyond sports alone. Fans are not only paying for sports streaming services, cable packages, and League Pass subscriptions. They are also paying for music platforms, movie streaming services, TV apps, and several other digital subscriptions. So consumers are increasingly becoming overwhelmed by monthly payments spread across multiple platforms. In fact, Cathy herself claimed she is also a victim of it. As she said, âI think I paid for 18 subscriptions and I still havenât cut the cable cord.â
But what do you think? Do you think this is a problem that will improve anytime soon? Or as the WNBA continues to grow, the viewing experience will only become even more fragmented and expensive for fans?
The viewing experience has become more expensive and increasingly fragmented for fans. But it appears to be a good enough trade-off for Cathy Engelbert considering the massive growth and expanding national coverage that the WNBA is now enjoying. âRemember when I joined the league, we had 15 games on national platforms, mostly on ESPN2 and ESPNU,â Engelbert said. âThis year weâll have 216 out of 330 regular-season games on national platforms. Thatâs over 65% broadcast nationally.â
âWhile Cathy Engelbert does understand fansâ frustrations about the rising cost of watching games, the WNBA has dramatically increased its national visibility to a level that now surpasses even leagues like the National Hockey League and Major League Baseball in terms of the percentage of games broadcast nationally. As she said, âI donât disagree with the cost point. Weâre outpacing the NHL and MLB on visibility as far as percentages. That was important.â
âI think itâs important to the players that they be shown and their stories be told,â Cathy also added. For her, the WNBA is no longer just getting games televised. The league and its players are now receiving full-scale media promotion and storytelling attention from broadcasters. And that is both good and important for the growth of the league and the visibility of its players.
According to Cathy, this was not the case when she first became commissioner. Broadcasters were mostly just showing games without investing much in surrounding WNBA coverage. Now, however, every major broadcast partner is creating additional WNBA-focused content and actively marketing the league. âWhen I joined the league, no one was doing any shoulder programming,â she said. âNow every single broadcast partner is doing shoulder programming. They are also doing marketing of the W.â
Without doubt, the benefits the WNBA has gained from this increased national attention and media investment have been substantial. But the impact on fans has not been quite as positive. And that ultimately begs the question: is it really possible for a sports league like the WNBA to grow, expand, and increase its national reach without fans eventually bearing some of the financial burden too?
Trending Articles
The post âCanât Fix The Costâ: Cathy Engelbert Addresses Expensive Viewing Experience Amid WNBAâs $3.1B Media Rights Deal appeared first on EssentiallySports. Add EssentiallySports as a Preferred Source by clicking here.