Charlie McAvoy of the Bruins has been suspended for six games due to a reckless slash on Zach Benson during a playoff game. This incident highlights ongoing issues with consistency in NHL player safety enforcement.
Key points
Charlie McAvoy received a six-game suspension
The suspension is for a slash on Zach Benson
Incident occurred during a playoff game
NHL faces criticism for inconsistent player safety enforcement
McAvoy's suspension begins next season
Charlie McAvoyZach BensonBoston BruinsBuffalo Sabres
Charlie McAvoyâs slash on Zach Benson was reckless, emotional, and fully deserving of supplemental discipline â but the NHL Department of Player Safetyâs handling of the entire sequence once again exposed just how inconsistent and difficult to decipher player safety can be when precedent, context, and retaliation collide.
The league announced Tuesday evening that the Bruins defenseman will serve a six-game suspension to begin next season after his late-game slash on Benson during Bostonâs Game 6 elimination loss to the Buffalo Sabres. McAvoy was assessed a major penalty and game misconduct on the play with less than 90 seconds remaining, effectively ending both his night and the Bruinsâ season in one ugly moment.
There is no real argument that McAvoy should have escaped punishment. You cannot swing your stick down on an opponent in retaliation, no matter how heated the situation becomes. The NHL had to respond, and six games falls within a range that feels reasonable.
Q&A
Why was Charlie McAvoy suspended for six games?
Charlie McAvoy was suspended for six games for a reckless slash on Zach Benson during a playoff game, which was deemed deserving of supplemental discipline.
What incident led to McAvoy's suspension?
McAvoy's suspension resulted from a late-game slash on Benson during the Bruins' Game 6 elimination loss to the Buffalo Sabres.
How does this suspension reflect on NHL player safety consistency?
The suspension underscores the NHL's ongoing issues with consistency in player safety enforcement, particularly regarding how similar incidents are handled.
When will McAvoy's suspension begin?
McAvoy's six-game suspension will begin at the start of the next NHL season.
Related Articles
Sports
Tennessee's Rick Barnes faces dwindling 'quality options' to fill final roster spot after portal success
Tennessee's men's basketball team has successfully recruited top transfers but still has one roster spot to fill. The only significant miss was the recruitment of seven-foot center Favour Ibe, who committed to Virginia.
Yahoo Sports··1 min read
Sports
Florida attorney general issues subpoena to NFL over Rooney Rule
Florida Attorney General issues subpoena to NFL regarding Rooney Rule and diversity policies.
Yahoo Sports··1 min read
Sports·Feature
FSU women's golf advance to 10th straight national championship
FSU Women's Golf Team Qualifies for 10th Straight National Championship!
Yahoo Sports··1 min read
Sports
After ACC and others throw support behind 24-team CFP, the ball is now in the SEC's court
The ACC and others back a 24-team CFP, awaiting SEC's decision.
Yahoo Sports··1 min read
Sports·Transfer
Michael Malone, UNC whiff on 2.6 blocks per game defensive star in transfer portal
Michael Malone and UNC miss out on 2.6 blocks per game star Devin Williams, who commits to Seton Hall.
Yahoo Sports··1 min read
NFL·Injury Update
Malik Nabers' injury recovery for Giants had a bump in the road
Malik Nabers' recovery from injury hits a bump; Giants hope for 2026 return.
See every story in Sports â including breaking news and analysis.
In fact, considering McAvoyâs history, it honestly could have been worse.
This marks the third suspension of his NHL career, following previous bans for illegal checks to the head against Josh Anderson and Oliver Ekman-Larsson. Repeat offenders are supposed to face escalating discipline, and given that background, the Department of Player Safety easily could have justified pushing this closer to eight games â maybe even more.
When Frustration Becomes The Real Infraction
But what complicates the conversation is the sequence that led to the retaliation in the first place.
Bensonâs slew foot on McAvoy was dangerous. There is really no softer way to describe it. Slew footing leaves players defenseless as their legs are taken out from underneath them, often sending them crashing backward with little ability to protect themselves. It is one of the more dangerous plays in hockey precisely because of its potential to cause head, neck, or back injuries.
And yet, Benson largely escaped meaningful punishment.
He received a minor penalty for tripping and moved on, while the retaliation that followed became the centerpiece of the leagueâs disciplinary response. That imbalance is where frustration around this incident starts to build, especially from Bostonâs perspective.
None of that excuses what McAvoy did. Veteran leaders are expected to maintain control, particularly franchise players wearing letters on their jerseys. But it is also not difficult to understand why emotions boiled over in that moment when a dangerous play appeared to receive little more than a shrug from the officials.
The NHLâs Inconsistency Problem Comes Into Focus
That gray area is exactly where NHL Player Safety consistently loses credibility with fans and players alike.
The league insists every incident is judged independently, but once you start stacking comparable cases together, the pattern becomes harder to ignore.
Take Alex Pietrangelo, for example. His two-handed slash on Leon Draisaitl in a late, frustrated playoff moment earned just one playoff game. Compared to McAvoyâs six regular-season games, it immediately raises the long-running question of how the league truly weighs playoff discipline versus regular-season suspensions.
Then there is Duncan Keith, who received a one-game suspension for a violent stick swing during the 2012 Western Conference Final that left Jeff Carter requiring 20 stitches. In that case, the on-ice damage arguably exceeded what McAvoy inflicted, yet the punishment was significantly lighter.
On the other end of the spectrum are the true outliers that define the extremes of NHL discipline. Chris Simon received a 30-game suspension for stomping on Jarkko Ruutu, while Marty McSorley was handed 23 games for striking Donald Brashear with his stick. Those incidents sit in a completely different category of violence, but they still help frame how far the league has historically gone when stick-related conduct crosses a certain line.
Even the middle ground remains messy. Keith Ballard received a four-game suspension for a retaliatory slash on Matt Martin. Auston Matthews received two games for a cross-check/slash combination on Rasmus Dahlin. And players like P.K. Subban have swung between fines and suspensions depending on timing, context, and interpretation.
Put it all together, and the McAvoy ruling doesnât feel wrong â but it doesnât feel fully consistent either.
Six games are defensible. Thatâs the uncomfortable truth. McAvoy crossed a line, and the league had to respond meaningfully.
But the broader issue remains unchanged: similar actions continue to produce different outcomes depending on timing, history, optics, and who happens to be making the call.
Take some examples for this yearâs post-season. Ridly Greig was given just two games for a sucker punch to Sean Walker, who was already tied up with another player. The punch left Walker bleeding, and it came at a moment when the Ottawa Senators were down and out against the Carolina Hurricanes. Additionally, Arber Xhekaj of the Montreal Canadiens and Josh Norris of the Sabres threw some questionable punches in Game 3 of the second round and went unpunished.
Even Anaheim Ducksâ Radko Gudas was given fewer games for ending Toronto Maple Leafsâ Auston Matthewsâ season with a brutal knee-on-knee hit.
Until that part of the system becomes clearer, every ruling like this will sit in the same uncomfortable space â somewhere between justified discipline and educated guesswork.